2023
DOI: 10.1111/joor.13411
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Standardised Tool for the Assessment of Bruxism

Abstract: Objective: This paper aims to present and describe the Standardised Tool for the Assessment of Bruxism (STAB), an instrument that was developed to provide a multidimensional evaluation of bruxism status, comorbid conditions, aetiology and consequences.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
47
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(101 reference statements)
0
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This lack of interest could be explained by the compelling issues related to the diagnosis, clinical management, and rehabilitative needs of DOC patients, which, in part, can overshadow this intriguing topic that deserves more attention. Another reason why bruxism in DOC patients has been neglected is probably that self-report of the symptoms by patients is not possible [ 2 , 17 ]. As a result, disorders related to NFJMA presence are underrated in DOC patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This lack of interest could be explained by the compelling issues related to the diagnosis, clinical management, and rehabilitative needs of DOC patients, which, in part, can overshadow this intriguing topic that deserves more attention. Another reason why bruxism in DOC patients has been neglected is probably that self-report of the symptoms by patients is not possible [ 2 , 17 ]. As a result, disorders related to NFJMA presence are underrated in DOC patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PG is low-cost, easy to apply at the patient’s bedside, repeatable, and free of side effects. In the last decade, neurophysiological techniques such as PG are growing in importance both in the diagnostic workup of DOC patients [ 11 , 13 , 14 ] as well as in the diagnosis of bruxism [ 1 , 15 , 16 , 17 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important to develop multidimensional evaluation tools for SB in children that are not defined in terms of the simple dichotomy of ‘present versus absent’. Regretfully, a standard tool for the assessment of bruxism (STAB), such as the one recently published for use in adults [ 57 ], does not yet refer to children. Further studies to validate parental reports through instruments relying on artificial intelligence are necessary.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2012, based on the definitions developed in the 8th edition of the Glossary of Prosthodontic Terms (GPT-8) [ 2 ], in the second edition of the International Classification of Sleep Disorders (ICSD-2) [ 3 ], and in the fourth edition of the Orofacial Pain Guidelines (OFPG-4) [ 4 ], published by the American Academy of Orofacial Pain, a new definition of bruxism was developed that could be used by all specialists. In 2018, the second Consensus on bruxism was developed in which separate definitions were formulated for the two forms of bruxism [ 5 ], and later, in 2020, the development of a standardized system for evaluating bruxism was proposed (STAB—Standardized Tool for the Assessment of Bruxism) [ 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 ]. According to this standardized system, future research in the field of bruxism will be directed along two axes: Axis A, which will include studies related to the evaluation of bruxism, and Axis B, which will include studies related to the etiology of bruxism, risk factors, and predisposing factors and the importance of the two forms of bruxism (SB and AB) due to different etiologies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%