2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2011.03.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Standard-Chinese Lexical Neighborhood Test in normal-hearing young children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) subjects had bilateral profound hearing loss before implantation, and the hearing loss occurred before 2 years of age; (2) subjects were capable of performing open-set word recognition tests*; (3) oral language was the subject's primary method of communication; (4) subjects had no other disabilities such as vision problems or cognitive deficits; and (5) no additional assistive listening device was coupled to the CI, such as frequency modulationsystem. To compare the performance of CI children with the performance of normal-hearing children, we extracted data for the normal-hearing children from a previous study (Liu et al 2011). Unaided hearing thresholds in both ears, CI thresholds in the implanted ears, and other participant demographics such as age at the time of evaluation, duration of CI use, and age at implantation are summarized in Table 1.…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) subjects had bilateral profound hearing loss before implantation, and the hearing loss occurred before 2 years of age; (2) subjects were capable of performing open-set word recognition tests*; (3) oral language was the subject's primary method of communication; (4) subjects had no other disabilities such as vision problems or cognitive deficits; and (5) no additional assistive listening device was coupled to the CI, such as frequency modulationsystem. To compare the performance of CI children with the performance of normal-hearing children, we extracted data for the normal-hearing children from a previous study (Liu et al 2011). Unaided hearing thresholds in both ears, CI thresholds in the implanted ears, and other participant demographics such as age at the time of evaluation, duration of CI use, and age at implantation are summarized in Table 1.…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2,[221][222][223][224][225][226][227][228] The English version of the LNT and MLNT both consist of "easy" and "hard" word lists (Kirk et al 1995). Recently, versions of the LNT and MLNT have been developed in several languages besides English (Yuen et al 2008;Wang et al 2010;Liu et al 2011). Recently, versions of the LNT and MLNT have been developed in several languages besides English (Yuen et al 2008;Wang et al 2010;Liu et al 2011).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The development of auditory perception and speech production skills was assessed using the following test batteries: the Categories of Auditory Performance (CAP) [20], the Meaningful Auditory Integration Scale (MAIS) [21], the Infant-Toddler Meaningful Auditory Integration Scale (IT-MAIS) [22], the Standard-Chinese version of the Monosyllabic Lexical Neighborhood Test (LNT), the Multisyllabic Lexical Neighborhood Test (MLNT) [23], the Speech Intelligibility Rating (SIR) [24] and the Meaningful Use of Speech Scale (MUSS).…”
Section: Evaluation Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%