2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102327
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stakeholder perceptions in flood risk assessment: A hybrid fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS approach for Istanbul, Turkey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Urbanization and growing population have increased the significance of a sustainable utilization of water resources, particularly in rapidly developing urban areas (Koc & Isik 2020;Ekmekcioglu et al 2021). An increase in impermeable areas with the effect of urbanization reduces the storm water infiltration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Urbanization and growing population have increased the significance of a sustainable utilization of water resources, particularly in rapidly developing urban areas (Koc & Isik 2020;Ekmekcioglu et al 2021). An increase in impermeable areas with the effect of urbanization reduces the storm water infiltration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Luan et al [33] The use of TOPSIS to evaluate green infrastructure for stormwater in a Chinese sponge city Zeng et al [34] The use of TOPSIS to identify green infrastructure solutions for stormwater management in a Chinese smart city AHP-TOPSIS Gogate et al [35] The use of AHP-TOPSIS to identify stormwater management alternative performances in an Indian urban area Moghadas et al [36] The use of AHP-TOPSIS to evaluate flood risk in an Iranian urban area Ekmekcioglu et al [37] Fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS for flood risk mapping in a Turkish municipalities Koc et al [38] Fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS for stormwater management in a Turkish urban watershed.…”
Section: Multi-criteria Decision Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, the existing literature is focused on developing tools to find a solution to the stormwater issues the world faces while considering multiple stakeholder involved in the decision-making process. Aside from a few notable examples that consider differences between the stakeholders involved [25,26,37], however, there is little focus on how to manage the differences in opinions and how this affect the end policy decision. If differences emerge between the stakeholders involved in the MCDA it is important to acknowledge these differences so that policy can then attempt to address the disparities.…”
Section: Multi-criteria Decision Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scheme selection belongs to the decision-making problem. Currently, the most widely used methods are entropy weight method [34], fuzzy set theory [35], TOPSIS decision-making method [36], vague set theory [37], interval-valued [38] and grey relational decision-making [39]. All these methods need to normalize the alternative set to obtain the initial weight coefficients or membership degrees of evaluation indexes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%