2017
DOI: 10.1109/mele.2017.2718858
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stability of Shipboard DC Power Distribution: Online Impedance-Based Systems Methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
48
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, their cut-off frequency should be chosen significantly lower than the expected crossover frequency of the loop under investigation. Different attenuation levels, obtained by changing the cut-off frequency or the order of the filter, resultf As can be noticed, the choice of f lpf does not affect the average values of the obtained estimates, but it affects the superimposed sinusoidal fluctuation at 2f , as highlighted also in (8) and (9). Fig.…”
Section: B Mt Applied To the Droop Loopmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, their cut-off frequency should be chosen significantly lower than the expected crossover frequency of the loop under investigation. Different attenuation levels, obtained by changing the cut-off frequency or the order of the filter, resultf As can be noticed, the choice of f lpf does not affect the average values of the obtained estimates, but it affects the superimposed sinusoidal fluctuation at 2f , as highlighted also in (8) and (9). Fig.…”
Section: B Mt Applied To the Droop Loopmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…A significant example of the latter case can be found in shipboard dc power distribution systems, where the behavior seen by a converter from its load and source sides can tremendously change along the course of a mission; this rises stability concerns about the interactions among the subsystems. In this context, continuous, online estimates of the stability-margins can be effectively exploited to tune the converters controllers, thus ensuring a reliable operation [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many physical nonlinear systems in general satisfy the Euler-Lagrange (EL) conditions and therefore can be represented in the PCH framework [13]. The PCH model of a non-linear system is given by equation (1). It results from the network modelling of a physical system containing lumpedparameters with independent energy storage elements [10] [12].…”
Section: A Port-controlled Hamiltonian (Pch) Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, the vector ( , ) captures two types of interconnection, namely the standard interconnection and the "constant source inputs" [10]. For a buck converter however, the control variable is separable from the interconnection structure, leading to the PCH model given in (1). The advantage of a Type (1) PCH system is the derivability of the control law from the matching equation in a straightforward manner.…”
Section: A Port-controlled Hamiltonian (Pch) Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ongoing interactions between PEIs and RESs introduce new barriers related to stability and control issues [2][3][4]. For the stability analysis of any system, which is a preliminary assessment of its reliable operation, small-and large-signal analyses are widely used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%