2010
DOI: 10.1017/s0022112010002491
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stability of pressure-driven flow in a deformable neo-Hookean channel

Abstract: The stability of pressure-driven flow in a rectangular channel with deformable neo-Hookean viscoelastic solid walls is analysed for a wide range of Reynolds numbers (from Re ≪ 1 to Re ≫ 1) by considering both sinuous and varicose modes for the perturbations. Pseudospectral numerical and asymptotic methods are employed to uncover the various unstable modes, and their stability boundaries are determined in terms of the solid elasticity parameter Γ = Vη/(ER) and the Reynolds number Re = RV ρ/η; here V is the maxi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
34
2
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
3
34
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We used a two values of N = 50 and N = 60 to get the convergent results discussed in § 5. The linear stability calculations were first validated with the results of Gaurav & Shankar (2010) for the parabolic flow in a channel with flat walls, and found quantitative agreement for the eigenvalues for that problem. The same eigenvalue search procedure was used for the velocity profiles predicted by the CFD simulations in our linear stability analysis.…”
Section: Linear Stability Analysismentioning
confidence: 87%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…We used a two values of N = 50 and N = 60 to get the convergent results discussed in § 5. The linear stability calculations were first validated with the results of Gaurav & Shankar (2010) for the parabolic flow in a channel with flat walls, and found quantitative agreement for the eigenvalues for that problem. The same eigenvalue search procedure was used for the velocity profiles predicted by the CFD simulations in our linear stability analysis.…”
Section: Linear Stability Analysismentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The method of analysis is identical to that of Gaurav & Shankar (2010), with two important differences. First, we have a rigid wall at the boundary at y = h 0 + h , in contrast to Gaurav & Shankar (2010) who had a flexible surface.…”
Section: Linear Stability Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In this section, we extend the above low-k results to arbitrary wavenumbers to ensure whether the predicted suppression in long wave limit holds for finite and high wavenumber perturbations as well. Furthermore, flow past deformable solid surface (involving only a fluid-solid interface) could become unstable on increasing the deformability in the absence of inertia (Kumaran et al 1994;Gkanis & Kumar 2003), and several additional unstable fluid-solid modes proliferate when inertia is present (Chokshi & Kumaran 2008;Gaurav & Shankar 2009, 2010b. All these fluid-solid unstable modes are not captured by the low-k analysis presented in the previous section.…”
Section: Numerical Results: Manipulation For Arbitrary Wavelength Dismentioning
confidence: 95%