2007
DOI: 10.1109/lcomm.2007.060716
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stability of Networked Control Systems with Time-Varying Delays

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In Zhang and Yu (2007a), also the clocks of controller and sensor are assumed synchronized which is a restrictive assumption. In Chen et al (2007) the stability for a specific network protocol namely TCP is investigated. In Jiang et al (2008) the packet losses are also considered, while stability for delay is investigated, so this test is also a candidate for our stability test.…”
Section: Previous Work On Ncs Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In Zhang and Yu (2007a), also the clocks of controller and sensor are assumed synchronized which is a restrictive assumption. In Chen et al (2007) the stability for a specific network protocol namely TCP is investigated. In Jiang et al (2008) the packet losses are also considered, while stability for delay is investigated, so this test is also a candidate for our stability test.…”
Section: Previous Work On Ncs Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Walsh et al (2002), Walsh and Ye (2001), Gu et al (2003Gu et al ( , 2004, , Lin et al (2003), Lin and Antsaklis, (2005), Bauer et al (1993), Zhang, Yu (2007b), Chen et al (2007), Jiang et al (2008) and Kim et al (2003) Stability analysis based delay bound derivation Network optimized, control system performance is not considered Wu et al (2006), Hong and Song, (2008) and Audsley et al (1993) bandwidth sharing Davis et al (2007) and Schmidt (2010a, 2010b) Optimal schedule computation, schedulability analysis…”
Section: Approach Further Commentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the predictive method, the subinterval in which the current C-A delay may fall can be predicted by using (5) and (6), and then the prediction of the current C-A delay is taken from the midpoint of the subinterval as shown in (7). This predicting method aims to guarantee that the subinterval in which the predicted delay falls is the same as the subinterval in which the corresponding real delay falls, which is enough to guarantee the system stability by compensating this predicted delay given that the delay interval is divided into many enough subintervals and the NCS with delays is modeled as a discrete-time MJLS.…”
Section: Dthmm Derivation and Delay Prediction On The Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The properties of the network-induced delays in a general NCS were described in [4]. The stability analyses of the NCS with delays were presented in [5][6], and the controller design methods of the NCS with delays were proposed in [7][8]. Moreover, when the random delays have Markovian characteristic, the NCS can be formulated as a Markovian jump linear system (MJLS).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A better characterization of how real-time networks exchange information between system components is an important step towards a precise description of stability and robustness properties for this class of systems [1,2]. The study of strategies to deal with packet size constraints, time delays, uncertain sampling rates, and so on, in NCS has received a special attention lately, as can be seen in [3][4][5][6][7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%