2012
DOI: 10.1007/s00229-012-0583-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stability analysis of asymptotic profiles for sign-changing solutions to fast diffusion equations

Abstract: Every solution u = u(x, t) of the Cauchy-Dirichlet problem for the fast diffusion equation, ∂ t (|u| m−2 u) = ∆u in Ω × (0, ∞) with a smooth bounded domain Ω of R N and 2 < m < 2 * := 2N/(N − 2) + , vanishes in finite time at a power rate. This paper is concerned with asymptotic profiles of sign-changing solutions and a stability analysis of the profiles. Our method of proof relies on a detailed analysis of a dynamical system on some surface in the usual energy space as well as energy method and variational me… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Related Problems: signed solutions and subcritical range. In the case of signed solution the situation gets even more involved [1,2,3,4]. As for the subcritical range: the case m = m s corresponds to the celebrated Yamabe flow, many results have been obtained in different settings, but sharp asymptotic results are still missing for the Dirichlet problem.…”
Section: (Rcdp)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Related Problems: signed solutions and subcritical range. In the case of signed solution the situation gets even more involved [1,2,3,4]. As for the subcritical range: the case m = m s corresponds to the celebrated Yamabe flow, many results have been obtained in different settings, but sharp asymptotic results are still missing for the Dirichlet problem.…”
Section: (Rcdp)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then the function t → R(u(t)) is non-increasing, and hence, so is the function s → R(v(s)) (see, e.g., [6,30,36,1]).…”
Section: 1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, from the continuity of t * : H 1 0 (Ω) → [0, ∞) (see [1,Proposition 4]) and the fact that t * (φ) = 1 by φ ∈ X , one deduces that v 0,µ → φ strongly in H 1 0 (Ω), whence v 0,µ belongs to B H 1 0 (Ω) (φ; r 0 ) for µ sufficiently close to 1. However, these facts contradict the local minimality of J at φ over X .…”
Section: Local Minimizers Of J Over Xmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations