2009
DOI: 10.4238/vol8-4gmr659
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SSR analysis demonstrates that olive production in the southern Marmara region in Turkey uses a single genotype

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
8
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
4
8
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Among the 4 loci, the EMO3 locus (H E = 0.83) showed the highest value of genetic diversity while the lowest diversity value was found using primer EMO2 (H E = 0.68), with a mean value of 0.75. In accord with prior findings (Diaz et al, 2006), our high heterozygosity values were similar to those of several studies that used SSR markers on olive cultivars in Italian regions as such Sicily (La Mantia et al, 2005) and Emilia (Ganino et al, 2007), of the Istria region in Croatia (Poljuha et al, 2008) as well as in the southern Marmara region in Turkey (Ipek et al, 2009). Also, the mean observed heterozygosity values (H O = 0.78) of the present study were higher than expected (H E = 0.75) and in general higher than previous studies using cultivars from different areas of the Mediterranean basin (Sarri et al, 2006).…”
Section: Ssr Polymorphismsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Among the 4 loci, the EMO3 locus (H E = 0.83) showed the highest value of genetic diversity while the lowest diversity value was found using primer EMO2 (H E = 0.68), with a mean value of 0.75. In accord with prior findings (Diaz et al, 2006), our high heterozygosity values were similar to those of several studies that used SSR markers on olive cultivars in Italian regions as such Sicily (La Mantia et al, 2005) and Emilia (Ganino et al, 2007), of the Istria region in Croatia (Poljuha et al, 2008) as well as in the southern Marmara region in Turkey (Ipek et al, 2009). Also, the mean observed heterozygosity values (H O = 0.78) of the present study were higher than expected (H E = 0.75) and in general higher than previous studies using cultivars from different areas of the Mediterranean basin (Sarri et al, 2006).…”
Section: Ssr Polymorphismsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Later, amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) markers were found to be useful for the assessment of genetic diversity between olive cultivars, wild genotypes, and Olea species (Angiolillo et al, 1999;Owen et al, 2005;Ercisli et al, 2009). Simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers are another choice of marker technology for the characterization of olive genotypes and a considerable number of SSR markers have been developed for the olive genome in recent years (e.g., Rallo et al, 2000;Sefc et al, 2000;Ipek et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The observed heterozygosity (Ho) was higher than the expected heterozygosity (He) for DCA-11, DCA-16, DCA-17 and GAPU-89, while the Ho was lower than the He for DCA-04, DCA-09 and UDO-14 ( The names in parentheses are synonyms given by the local growers; † a number was given to each sample to prevent confusion because more than one sample was collected for the most of cultivars. SSR markers have been developed for olives by several research groups (Carriero et al, 2002;Cipriani et al, 2002;Sefc et al, 2000), and this marker system was found to be the most reliable, effective and easy-to-use for cultivar identification in olives (Baldoni et al, 2009;Ipek et al, 2009;Muzzalupo et al, 2010;Sarri et al, 2006). In some studies, polyacrylamide gels and DNA analysis systems with fluorescent labeling were used for detecting polymorphic alleles of SSR markers (Baldoni et al, 2009;Carriero et al, 2002;Gomes et al, 2008;Sarri et al, 2006).…”
Section: Ssr Polymorphisms Among Olive Cultivarsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Morphological and pomological characteristics of common Turkish olive cultivars were previously determined by Canozer (1991). Genetic variation among some Turkish olive cultivars was analyzed using DNA based molecular markers (Owen et al, 2005;Ozkaya et al, 2006;Ercisli et al, 2009;Ipek et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%