2021
DOI: 10.1109/tip.2021.3077135
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SRGAT: Single Image Super-Resolution With Graph Attention Network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, it was concluded that the diagnostic sensitivity (95.34%), specificity (75%), and accuracy (94.44%) of SR-CNN algorithm-based MRI images were obviously superior to those of conventional MRI (81.40%, 50%, and 80%). The conclusion revealed that SR-CNN algorithm-based MRI images could improve the diagnostic effect of MRI images, which was consistent with the outcomes of the studies conducted by Yan et al [25] and Park et al [26] and provided the basis for the accuracy of subsequent studies. Based on the above research results, the effect of TC on children with SVE was investigated and compared with conventional nursing effect.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…In addition, it was concluded that the diagnostic sensitivity (95.34%), specificity (75%), and accuracy (94.44%) of SR-CNN algorithm-based MRI images were obviously superior to those of conventional MRI (81.40%, 50%, and 80%). The conclusion revealed that SR-CNN algorithm-based MRI images could improve the diagnostic effect of MRI images, which was consistent with the outcomes of the studies conducted by Yan et al [25] and Park et al [26] and provided the basis for the accuracy of subsequent studies. Based on the above research results, the effect of TC on children with SVE was investigated and compared with conventional nursing effect.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Step 3: For each target patch x i in X 0 , utilize steer kernel regression to estimate matrix T i , perform shape-adaptive grouping on X 0 and calculate each low-rank matrix T i 􏽥 X i via (15). Step 4: Obtain the final reconstructed HR image 􏽢 X� X H via (16).…”
Section: Experiments On Noisymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where D refers to a downsampling operator, H represents a blur matrix, X and Y, respectively, denote the original HR image and the degraded LR image, and v is additive Gaussian noise. Generally, existing SISR methods can be divided into interpolation-based approaches [1][2][3], reconstruction-based approaches [4][5][6][7], and learning-based approaches [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, most CNN-based SR methods usually treat different feature contents equally and lack the ability discriminate the desired high-frequency details. In recent years, some researchers proposed to apply attention mechanism to enhance the discriminative representation of the network and achieved good experimental performance, which has been widely used in many computer vision tasks [25][26][27]. Hu et al [28] proposed the squeeze-and-excitation block to learn the channel-wise information and improve the representation ability of the model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%