The Handbook of Speech Perception
DOI: 10.1002/9780470757024.ch24
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spoken Word Recognition: The Challenge of Variation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
42
0

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
1
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, there is plenty of precedence to suggest that our observed effects would generalize to other diverse samples of models and shadowers of both genders. Within the speech literature, robust visual (for reviews, see Fowler, 2004;Rosenblum, 2008) and lexical (for a review, see Luce & McLennan, 2005) influences on auditory speech perception are reported across diverse samples of models and participants, with many studies employing stimuli derived from a single model talker (e.g., Brancazio, 2004;Erber, 1971;Luce, Pisoni, & Goldinger, 1990;Remez et al, 1998;Rosenblum et al, 1996;Ross et al, 2007;Tye-Murray, Sommers, & Spehar, 2007). Within the phonetic convergence literature (much of which is cited in this article), automatic imitation of perceived speech has been observed across studies employing diverse samples of models, shadowers, and conversational partners.…”
Section: Lexical Characteristics Influence Phonetic Convergencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there is plenty of precedence to suggest that our observed effects would generalize to other diverse samples of models and shadowers of both genders. Within the speech literature, robust visual (for reviews, see Fowler, 2004;Rosenblum, 2008) and lexical (for a review, see Luce & McLennan, 2005) influences on auditory speech perception are reported across diverse samples of models and participants, with many studies employing stimuli derived from a single model talker (e.g., Brancazio, 2004;Erber, 1971;Luce, Pisoni, & Goldinger, 1990;Remez et al, 1998;Rosenblum et al, 1996;Ross et al, 2007;Tye-Murray, Sommers, & Spehar, 2007). Within the phonetic convergence literature (much of which is cited in this article), automatic imitation of perceived speech has been observed across studies employing diverse samples of models, shadowers, and conversational partners.…”
Section: Lexical Characteristics Influence Phonetic Convergencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Coding in primary auditory cortex is sensitive even to minor physical transformations. Object-centered coding in higher areas, however, must be invariant (i.e., tolerant of natural stimulus variation) (6). For example, whereas the phonemic structure of a word is fixed, there is considerable variation in physical, spectrotemporal form-attributable to accent, pronunciation, body size, and the like-among utterances of a given word.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has changed in the past decade. The question of lexical representations and the processes via which different variants of a same word are accessed is now considered to be a major challenge in the field of adult psycholinguistics (Luce and McLennan, 2005). The studies contained in this volume, as well as other very recent studies 1 (Miller, 2012 inter alia) illustrate the same turn in the field of language acquisition.…”
mentioning
confidence: 64%