ICCAD-2003. International Conference on Computer Aided Design (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37486) 2003
DOI: 10.1109/iccad.2003.159745
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

/spl tau/AU: Timing analysis under uncertainty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Formulation (12) is a stochastic optimization problem. The statistical analysis and design of digital circuits is an area of growing interest and importance; see, e.g., Agarwal et al (2003), Bhardwaj et al (2003), Brambilla and Maffezzoni (2001), Jyu et al (1993), Orshansky et al (1999), and Orshansky and Keutzer (2002). This is still an active research area, and no consensus has emerged as to what the best statistical models are.…”
Section: Statistical Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Formulation (12) is a stochastic optimization problem. The statistical analysis and design of digital circuits is an area of growing interest and importance; see, e.g., Agarwal et al (2003), Bhardwaj et al (2003), Brambilla and Maffezzoni (2001), Jyu et al (1993), Orshansky et al (1999), and Orshansky and Keutzer (2002). This is still an active research area, and no consensus has emerged as to what the best statistical models are.…”
Section: Statistical Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Suppose that each of the four physical parameters requires in its representation three principal components. From (22), path delay will be expanded in terms of 12 principal components. Fig.…”
Section: A Yield-margin Curves and Virtual Cornersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aim is to extend traditional STA so that it takes into account statistical delay variations [5], [6], [16]- [22] leading to a statistical STA (SSTA). Given the difficulty of early estimation of systematic within-die variations, they have often been ignored; thus, within-die variations were accounted for on a random basis only [6], [13], [18], [21], [22], which is undesirable. In order to avoid making this assumption, one needs to express the within-die correlations with a model that can be easily built from process data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It states that, given two random vectors V and W having the same variances (i.e., σ ii = γ ii ), if one of them is more correlated than the other (i.e., σ ij ≥ γ ij for all i = j) then (8) and (9) hold.…”
Section: N) Be Two Random Vectors Of Size N Both Multi-normallmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a number of cases [2,6,7,8], it has been assumed that within-die variations are totally uncorrelated, an assumption which is not true in practice. It is usually hard to express the correlations between within-die parameter variations with a model built from process data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%