Spinal high-velocity low-amplitude manipulation with exercise in women with chronic temporomandibular disorders

Corum, Mustafa; Başoğlu, Cengiz; Topaloğlu, Mahir; Dıraçoğlu, Demirhan; Aksoy, Cihan

doi:10.1007/s00337-018-0406-5

Cited by 11 publications

(42 citation statements)

References 35 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Blackburn et al [25] reported that the pain reduction after WBV training may be that the increase in sensory inputs from the mechano-receptors of the skin, joint and muscle responses caused by vibration could also a favor reduction in pain level caused by physical activity in subjects with PFPS or even improve the quadriceps atherogenic muscle inhibition. Mustafa et al [26] concluded that Whole Body Vibration training was more effective in reducing knee pain intensity and increasing knee extensor muscular performance. The findings also indicate that Whole Body Vibration training plus home exercise was not found to be more effective than home exercise alone for efficient functional enhancement and quality of improvement.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Whole body vibration versus Kinesio-taping technique in patellofemoral pain syndrome

Mohamed

Raoof

Allah

2022

ijhs

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome (PFPS) is a common musculoskeletal problem especially in adolescents and patellar tracking or malposition and lower limb muscle strength have been implicated a contributing factor. Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare between the effect of Whole Body Vibration technique versus Kinesio-Taping technique on pain threshold, pain intensity and functional level "mobility" in patients with Patello-Femoral Pain Syndrome. Methods: Forty five patients of both genders with age ranged from eighteen to forty years old participated in this study. They were assigned randomly into three groups (Group A, Group B and Group C). Group A consisted of 15 patients received Whole Body Vibration technique (3 sessions per week for 4 weeks) in addition to conventional physical therapy exercises, Group B consisted of 15 patients received Kinesio-Taping technique (2 sessions per week for 4 weeks) in addition to conventional physical therapy exercises, Group C consisted of 15 patients received conventional physical therapy exercises only (3 sessions per week for 4 weeks). Pain threshold was measured by pressure algometry, pain intensity was measured by visual analogue scale and functional level was measured by kujala patellofemoral questionnaire.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Whole body vibration versus Kinesio-taping technique in patellofemoral pain syndrome

Mohamed

Raoof

Allah

2022

ijhs

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Within these, 997 duplicate studies were removed, and the remaining 1654 titles and abstracts were screened. The full text of 29 studies was then examined, with a resulting 7 studies [37][38][39][40][41][42][43] eligible for inclusion in our review. Among ineligible studies, papers were excluded due to absence of a pain outcome measure, absence of cervical rehabilitation intervention, ineligible populations or interventions or ineligible study design (Table S1).…”

Section: Re Sultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The seven included studies (Table 1) represent the experiences of 405 participants with characteristics of MTMD from six countries. Six studies [37][38][39][41][42][43] used the DC/TMD 29 to diagnose myalgia which included two studies 37,42 where participants could have a mixed (myogenous and arthrogenous) diagnostic criterion. Only one study 40 used their own diagnostic criteria to determine masticatory muscle myalgia.…”

Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The effectiveness of cervical rehabilitation interventions for pain in adults with myogenic temporomandibular disorders: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Bednarczyk,

Proulx,

Paez

2024

J of Oral Rehabilitation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ObjectiveLittle evidence exists for the most effective conservative treatment approach for adults with myogenic temporomandibular disorders (MTMD). We aim to assess the effectiveness of cervical rehabilitation interventions on pain intensity and sensitivity in adults with MTMD compared to comparison intervention such as placebo, sham treatment, education or no intervention.MethodsFor this systematic review and meta‐analysis, we searched PubMed, EMBASE, Medline, PEDro databases, forward and backward citations and grey literature studies through PROSPERO, clinical trials and data registries without language or date restrictions between inception and 1 December 2021. We selected randomised controlled trials (RCTs) based on adult populations with MTMD who had a cervical rehabilitation intervention which was defined as any conservative intervention targeting the anatomical structures of the cervical spine. The primary outcome measures for pain were self‐reported pain intensity and pain sensitivity through the pressure pain threshold (PPT) of the masseter and temporalis muscles. Secondary outcome measures of maximal mouth opening (on MMO) were included. Included studies were assessed for bias with the Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomised trials. Evidence from RCTs was synthesised to determine treatment effect size as differences between standardised mean difference (SMD) for changes in pain intensity, PPT and MMO comparing adults with MTMD who were treated with cervical rehabilitation interventions compared to a control group. This study is registered on Prospero, number CRD 42021289299.ResultsOur general search yielded 2647 studies where seven RCTs met eligibility criteria with low to some concerns in their risk of bias. Pain intensity (five studies, n = 223, SMD −0.98, 95% CI −1.67 to −0.28, I2 = 79%), PPT of the masseter muscle (six studies, n = 395, SMD 0.64, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.86, I2 = 90%) and the temporalis muscles (five studies, n = 295, SMD 0.76, 95% CI 0.07 to 1.45, I2 = 84%) showed large treatment effect estimates favouring cervical rehabilitation interventions compared to no treatment, sham cervical treatment, patient education or non‐cervical neuromuscular techniques. Compared to control interventions, one type of cervical rehabilitation intervention, cervical manual therapy alone or in combination with a neck exercise program was associated with statistically significant, large treatment effect estimates on pain intensity (four studies, n = 203, SMD −1.52, 95% CI −2.50 to −0.55).ConclusionsThis review found that in the short‐term, cervical rehabilitation interventions especially upper cervical MT alone or in combination with a neck exercise program are effective in improving multiple pain outcomes in adults with MTMD. However, further research is needed to measure the long‐term effects of this type of intervention.

show abstract

“…Temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) are painful conditions and dysfunctions in the masticatory muscles, temporomandibular joint (TMJ) and related structures (1) . The detection rate of at least one symptom of TMD in population is estimated to be range between18-33%, however the incidence of TMD requiring treatment is estimated to be approximately 5% in the community (1) . TMD is more common in women aged 20-40 years and 4 times more common in women than men (2) .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation of Cervical Dysfunctions in Temporomandibular Disorders

Corum¹

2021

BMJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: The purpose of this study is to investigate upper cervical segmental dysfunctions in female patients with chronic TMD with and without neck pain and to compare them with healthy subjects. Method: Patients admitted to our hospital with jaw pain were evaluated in this study, and a total of 152 patients and healthy subjects who met the inclusion criteria for the study were divided into 3 groups: TMD with neck pain (n = 94), TMD without neck pain (n = 28) and control (n = 30). Patients with myofascial pain (category I) or disc displacements (category II) were diagnosed based on the Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (RDC/TMD) guidelines. Upper cervical segmental dysfunctions were identified using functional and pain provocation tests in patients with TMD and healthy subjects. Results: When patients with TMD were classified, there was a significant difference between TMD with neck pain (category I, 62.8%; category II, 37.2%) and TMD without neck pain (category I, 28.6%; category II, 71.4%) groups (p = 0.002). There was a statistically significant dysfunction [difference] in all upper cervical segments in favor of the TMD with neck pain group compared TMD without neck pain group and healthy control group (p < 0.05). 51.1% Occiput-C1, 81.9% C1-C2 and 53.2% C2-C3 segment dysfunction rates were detected in TMD with neck pain group. Conclusion: Upper cervical segmental dysfunction rate was higher in TMD group with neck pain than TMD without neck pain and healthy control group.

show abstract

Spinal high-velocity low-amplitude manipulation with exercise in women with chronic temporomandibular disorders

Cited by 11 publications

References 35 publications

Whole body vibration versus Kinesio-taping technique in patellofemoral pain syndrome

Whole body vibration versus Kinesio-taping technique in patellofemoral pain syndrome

The effectiveness of cervical rehabilitation interventions for pain in adults with myogenic temporomandibular disorders: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Evaluation of Cervical Dysfunctions in Temporomandibular Disorders

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About