2007
DOI: 10.1097/brs.0b013e31815cddfc
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spinal Cord Injury in Patients With Ankylosing Spondylitis

Abstract: Neurologic deficits were often subtle on initial presentation, resulting in many injuries being missed because of a low index of suspicion and poor visualization of lower cervical fractures on conventional radiographs. Extension of the ankylosed kyphotic cervical spine during conventional immobilization or for radiologic procedures resulted in neurologic deficits. Patients with an ankylosed cervical spine are normally unable to see the ceiling lying supine because of cervicothoracic kyphosis and use pillows to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
78
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
78
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Very few papers depicted and analyzed cohorts of patients with AS-associating spine fractures, from a single medical center or region; 17,[21][22][23] other papers were systematic literature reviews. 11,18 Most of these retrospective descriptive papers (about 98%) brought out-similarly with our study-only small series of AS subjects who suffered spine fractures: 18 patients, 24 or 12 cases 25 during a 10-year period and 12 subjects 26 in 6 years. A plausible explanation for the scarcity of the cases consists of the epidemiological pattern of AS (mentioned earlier), making it difficult to establish a consistent cohort of patients in a single medical center.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Very few papers depicted and analyzed cohorts of patients with AS-associating spine fractures, from a single medical center or region; 17,[21][22][23] other papers were systematic literature reviews. 11,18 Most of these retrospective descriptive papers (about 98%) brought out-similarly with our study-only small series of AS subjects who suffered spine fractures: 18 patients, 24 or 12 cases 25 during a 10-year period and 12 subjects 26 in 6 years. A plausible explanation for the scarcity of the cases consists of the epidemiological pattern of AS (mentioned earlier), making it difficult to establish a consistent cohort of patients in a single medical center.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…As a paradigm, most of the fractures in AS patients are caused by low-energy impacts, and the most vulnerable is the cervical segment (66.7%). 18,24,28 Even in 'usual' traumatic conditions, the cervical segment is the most exposed region of the spinal column, due to its anatomical and biomechanical particularities (increased mobility, linear or translational kinetic momentum of the skull).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…62 This clinical deterioration can be the result of well-known mechanisms, such as hematomas, edema, hypotension, hypoxemia, or inflammation. [63][64][65] The collar should, in theory, protect patients from secondary spinal cord traumas by restricting inadvertent movements of unstable CSIs. However, we will probably never know how many secondary SCIs collars have prevented.…”
Section: How Effective Are Cervical Collars?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,2,11 The spine is thus rendered more susceptible to fracture from smaller physical loads, 4,23 making standard intubation techniques difficult and sometimes impossible.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although multiple reports have outlined treatment strategies for cervical fractures in patients with ankylosing spondylitis, 4,6,11,23 the incidence of new cervical fractures and spinal cord injuries that are specifically related to intubation in these patients appears to be exceedingly low. 6,10,19 Salathé and Jöhr reported the first such case in 1989, but pre-or postintubation radiographs were unavailable, leaving the etiology of the fracture unclear.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%