2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2020.10.050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spin transport in multilayer graphene away from the charge neutrality point

Abstract: Graphene is considered as a promising material in spintronics due to its long spin relaxation time and long spin relaxation length. However, its spin transport properties have been studied at low carrier density only, beyond which much is still unknown. In this study, we explore the spin transport and spin precession properties in multilayer graphene at high carrier density using ionic liquid gating. We find that the spin relaxation time is directly proportional to the momentum relaxation time, indicating that… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, we assumed a typical value of λ G (∼1.5 μm) for multilayer graphene by referring to our previous study. 47 Moreover, ΔR NL was ∼1.5 mΩ (Figure 2b), σ G was measured to be 6.1 mS, W was ∼2.5 μm, and L was ∼3 μm, so P J was calculated to be about 1%, close to the result achieved from the NLSV with transparent contacts. 48 Such a low injection efficiency could be attributed to two factors: first, there was still a conductivity mismatch between FGT and multilayer graphene, and thus the backflow of spins could not be avoided completely.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hence, we assumed a typical value of λ G (∼1.5 μm) for multilayer graphene by referring to our previous study. 47 Moreover, ΔR NL was ∼1.5 mΩ (Figure 2b), σ G was measured to be 6.1 mS, W was ∼2.5 μm, and L was ∼3 μm, so P J was calculated to be about 1%, close to the result achieved from the NLSV with transparent contacts. 48 Such a low injection efficiency could be attributed to two factors: first, there was still a conductivity mismatch between FGT and multilayer graphene, and thus the backflow of spins could not be avoided completely.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Since the Hanle effect was absent in our experiment, the spin relaxation length could not be determined. Hence, we assumed a typical value of λ G (∼1.5 μm) for multilayer graphene by referring to our previous study . Moreover, Δ R NL was ∼1.5 mΩ (Figure b), σ G was measured to be 6.1 mS, W was ∼2.5 μm, and L was ∼3 μm, so P J was calculated to be about 1%, close to the result achieved from the NLSV with transparent contacts .…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%