1993
DOI: 10.1016/0550-3213(93)90579-e
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sphaleron erasure of primordial baryogenesis

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
229
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 222 publications
(232 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
3
229
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From eqs. (2.18), (3.6) and η ≃ 0.06, one obtains for the R-parity breaking parameter 31) which is consistent with the present upper bound (5.10) within the theoretical uncertainties. The dependence of the mixing angle θ τ on m e τ 1 is shown in figure 5 for the boundary condition (5.2).…”
Section: τ -Lepton Nlspsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…From eqs. (2.18), (3.6) and η ≃ 0.06, one obtains for the R-parity breaking parameter 31) which is consistent with the present upper bound (5.10) within the theoretical uncertainties. The dependence of the mixing angle θ τ on m e τ 1 is shown in figure 5 for the boundary condition (5.2).…”
Section: τ -Lepton Nlspsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…As we shall see, the lower bound on the neutralino decay length is a direct consequence of the Fermi-LAT constraints on decaying dark matter. On the other hand, the lower bound on the τ -decay length is determined by the cosmological bounds on R-parity breaking couplings, which follow from the requirement that the baryon asymmetry is not washed out [29][30][31][32].…”
Section: Jhep10(2010)061mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Also, any source of new exotic baryon or lepton number violation together with the sphalerons has the potential to destroy the baryon asymmetry, even with a nonzero primordial component of B − L. To avoid this outcome, it appeared to be necessary to place stringent limits on various effective operators [8][9][10][11] . These limits however, were shown to be weakened significantly due to the effective conservation of e R -number at temperatures T > ∼ 10 TeV, and to only apply to flavour independent couplings [7,10,12,13] .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They observe that if there is no mixing of lepton generations and lepton number violating interactions are in thermal equilibrium for just one or two (but not all three) generations simultaneously with the sphaleron interactions, then a non-zero value of B can survive even if initially B−L = 0; but 1/3B − L i or 2/3B − (L i + L j ) must be non-zero where i(and j) is (are) the generation(s) for which the lepton number violating interactions are not in thermal equilibrium. Dreiner and Ross [8] have shown that, for a second or weakly first order EWPT, inclusion of the particle masses while analyzing the chemical equilibrium equations for T < T EW gives B ∼ 10 −7 ∆L for (B − L) initial = 0, where ∆L is the initial lepton generations' asymmetry ∆L = i>j (L i − L j ) and it is expected to be of the same order of magnitude as the initial lepton number. While Davidson et al [9] show that the inclusion of thermal mass effects for T > ∼ T EW also gives B ∼ 10 −7 ∆L at T ∼ T EW .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%