1980
Speech, Impedance, and Auditory Brainstem Response Audiometry in Brainstem Tumors: Importance of a Multiple-Test Strategy
Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Select...
30
0
0
0
Citation Types
0
2
0
0
Year Published
1981
2005
Publication Types
Select...
27
3
Relationship
0
30
Authors
Journals
Cited by 30 publications
(2 citation statements)
References 19 publications
0
2
0
0
“…However, the ABR may indicate a brainstem abnormality, but there is no precise correspondence between the ABR waveform and anatomical lesion sites [16], while the interpretation of the ABR depends on peripheral hearing parameters, but audiometric thresholds in neuronopathic GD have not been reported. Audiologic detection and evaluation of brainstem disorders requires a multiple test strategy [17]. Acoustic reflex threshold measurement (ART) [6] and otoacoustic emission suppression by contralateral noise (MOCS) [30] are two objective tests, i.e., that do not rely on the patients response, that have been used for evaluation of brainstem lesions.…”
Section: Original Articlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the ABR may indicate a brainstem abnormality, but there is no precise correspondence between the ABR waveform and anatomical lesion sites [16], while the interpretation of the ABR depends on peripheral hearing parameters, but audiometric thresholds in neuronopathic GD have not been reported. Audiologic detection and evaluation of brainstem disorders requires a multiple test strategy [17]. Acoustic reflex threshold measurement (ART) [6] and otoacoustic emission suppression by contralateral noise (MOCS) [30] are two objective tests, i.e., that do not rely on the patients response, that have been used for evaluation of brainstem lesions.…”
Section: Original Articlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…s -l o Stephens, et al, • reported that unilateral abnormalities in low redundancy speech tests, prolonged auditory reaction times, and reduced loudness growth on the al· ternate binaural loudness-balance test were related to ipsilateral wave IV abnormalities or contralateral wave V abnormalities of the ABR. Jerger, et al, 8 reported that the combination of normal or near ·normal pure tone sensitivity associated with an abnormal ABR is a strong retrocochlear sign. Musiek, et al, 10 reported that both ABR and central auditory test batteries were highly sensitive to brain stem lesions in this patient group as a whole, but the conventional speech discrimination test was not sensitive because none of the subjects with abnormal ABR demonstrated difficulty with speech discrimination.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
