1980
DOI: 10.1001/archotol.1980.00790280026005
|Get access via publisher |Summarize |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts

Speech, Impedance, and Auditory Brainstem Response Audiometry in Brainstem Tumors: Importance of a Multiple-Test Strategy

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
30
0
0
0

Citation Types

0
2
0
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
27
3

Relationship

0
30

Authors

Journals

citations

Cited by 30 publications

(2 citation statements)
references

References 19 publications

0
2
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the ABR may indicate a brainstem abnormality, but there is no precise correspondence between the ABR waveform and anatomical lesion sites [16], while the interpretation of the ABR depends on peripheral hearing parameters, but audiometric thresholds in neuronopathic GD have not been reported. Audiologic detection and evaluation of brainstem disorders requires a multiple test strategy [17]. Acoustic reflex threshold measurement (ART) [6] and otoacoustic emission suppression by contralateral noise (MOCS) [30] are two objective tests, i.e., that do not rely on the patients response, that have been used for evaluation of brainstem lesions.…”
Section: Original Articlementioning
confidence: 99%
Exaggerated anticipatory anxiety is common in social anxiety disorder (SAD). Neuroimaging studies have revealed altered neural activity in response to social stimuli in SAD, but fewer studies have examined neural activity during anticipation of feared social stimuli in SAD. The current study examined the time course and magnitude of activity in threat processing brain regions during speech anticipation in socially anxious individuals and healthy controls (HC). Method Participants (SAD n = 58; HC n = 16) underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) during which they completed a 90s control anticipation task and 90s speech anticipation task.
“…However, the ABR may indicate a brainstem abnormality, but there is no precise correspondence between the ABR waveform and anatomical lesion sites [16], while the interpretation of the ABR depends on peripheral hearing parameters, but audiometric thresholds in neuronopathic GD have not been reported. Audiologic detection and evaluation of brainstem disorders requires a multiple test strategy [17]. Acoustic reflex threshold measurement (ART) [6] and otoacoustic emission suppression by contralateral noise (MOCS) [30] are two objective tests, i.e., that do not rely on the patients response, that have been used for evaluation of brainstem lesions.…”
Section: Original Articlementioning
confidence: 99%
Exaggerated anticipatory anxiety is common in social anxiety disorder (SAD). Neuroimaging studies have revealed altered neural activity in response to social stimuli in SAD, but fewer studies have examined neural activity during anticipation of feared social stimuli in SAD. The current study examined the time course and magnitude of activity in threat processing brain regions during speech anticipation in socially anxious individuals and healthy controls (HC). Method Participants (SAD n = 58; HC n = 16) underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) during which they completed a 90s control anticipation task and 90s speech anticipation task.
“…s -l o Stephens, et al, • reported that unilateral abnormalities in low redundancy speech tests, prolonged auditory reaction times, and reduced loudness growth on the al· ternate binaural loudness-balance test were related to ipsilateral wave IV abnormalities or contralateral wave V abnormalities of the ABR. Jerger, et al, 8 reported that the combination of normal or near ·normal pure tone sensitivity associated with an abnormal ABR is a strong retrocochlear sign. Musiek, et al, 10 reported that both ABR and central auditory test batteries were highly sensitive to brain stem lesions in this patient group as a whole, but the conventional speech discrimination test was not sensitive because none of the subjects with abnormal ABR demonstrated difficulty with speech discrimination.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
Exaggerated anticipatory anxiety is common in social anxiety disorder (SAD). Neuroimaging studies have revealed altered neural activity in response to social stimuli in SAD, but fewer studies have examined neural activity during anticipation of feared social stimuli in SAD. The current study examined the time course and magnitude of activity in threat processing brain regions during speech anticipation in socially anxious individuals and healthy controls (HC). Method Participants (SAD n = 58; HC n = 16) underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) during which they completed a 90s control anticipation task and 90s speech anticipation task.
Exaggerated anticipatory anxiety is common in social anxiety disorder (SAD). Neuroimaging studies have revealed altered neural activity in response to social stimuli in SAD, but fewer studies have examined neural activity during anticipation of feared social stimuli in SAD. The current study examined the time course and magnitude of activity in threat processing brain regions during speech anticipation in socially anxious individuals and healthy controls (HC). Method Participants (SAD n = 58; HC n = 16) underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) during which they completed a 90s control anticipation task and 90s speech anticipation task.