1980
DOI: 10.1364/ao.19.003795
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spectral response self-calibration and interpolation of silicon photodiodes

Abstract: The possibility of interpolating the internal quantum efficiency of silicon photodiodes using a model with three adjustable parameters is investigated. The three parameters are determined from self-calibration measurements at 351, 476, and 800 nm. The internal quantum efficiency is then interpolated to 407 and 677 nm using the model. The calculated results are compared with direct measurements referenced to an electrical substitution radiometer. A difference of 0.6% was observed at 407 nm. This is probably sig… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
54
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The photocharge generation efficiency is a material property and depends on the magnitude and type of the material band gap relative to the energy level of the incident photons. The collection efficiency depends on the device structure and material quality and can be maxi-72 mized in a p-n junction by using: a proper doping profile, high-quality crystalline silicon and reverse biasing [7][8][9]. These issues are discussed in Section 1.3.2.1.…”
Section: Spectral Response In a Silicon Photodiodementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The photocharge generation efficiency is a material property and depends on the magnitude and type of the material band gap relative to the energy level of the incident photons. The collection efficiency depends on the device structure and material quality and can be maxi-72 mized in a p-n junction by using: a proper doping profile, high-quality crystalline silicon and reverse biasing [7][8][9]. These issues are discussed in Section 1.3.2.1.…”
Section: Spectral Response In a Silicon Photodiodementioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 The test QED 100 photodiode has an estimated precision of ±0.063 percent for a reverse bias of 9 V and ± 0.056 percent for a reverse bias of 18 V. 3 When the test QED 100 is compared to calorimeter C4-2, Figs. 3 and 4 show results within the instrument uncertainties.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At high-power levels and/or long wavelengths, l Ou-percent quantum efficiency is achieved by the application of a reverse-bias voltage to either offset the forward-bias current (high power) or increase the depth of the depletion region (long wavelength). Further explanation may be found in [2]. The light-trapping arrangement places the first three inversion-layer silicon photodiodes at 45 0 to the incident radiation, causing the radiation reflected from the first photodiode to be incident on the second and the radiation reflected from the second photodiode to be incident on the third.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If it is assumed that the change in reflectance is related just to a thickness change of the silicon oxide passivation layer [5,7,11] , an increase of about 2 nm over 30 nm would be needed approximately, to explain such a change. This type of change in the silicon oxide layer has not been referred in the literature (to the knowledge of the authors) and it is not likely to be produced since the detectors have been always kept at room temperature in dry environments.…”
Section: Fig5 Difference Between Previous Spectral Reflectance Valuementioning
confidence: 99%