Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on World Wide Web 2013
DOI: 10.1145/2488388.2488447
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatio-temporal dynamics of online memes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
53
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, (Crawford 2010) classifies the tweets into eight categories: a) user's current status; b) private conversations; c) links to web content; d) politics, sports, and current events; e) product recommendations/complaints; f) advertising; g) spam; and h) other (i.e., messages that match none of the above categories). Finally, one can focus on the content of tweets with an analysis based on the hashtags, such as (Kamath et al 2013), to identify the most relevant subjects. However, from our experience and also from a recent study (Potts et al 2011), although the use of hashtags to characterize a tweet is well known, most users tend to abuse (Woollaston 2013) or misuse (Henry 2012) hashtags or even to neglect the adoption of hashtags, leading to an even more complicated and most likely less reliable analysis.…”
Section: Methodology To Analyse Microblogging Content Based On the Exmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, (Crawford 2010) classifies the tweets into eight categories: a) user's current status; b) private conversations; c) links to web content; d) politics, sports, and current events; e) product recommendations/complaints; f) advertising; g) spam; and h) other (i.e., messages that match none of the above categories). Finally, one can focus on the content of tweets with an analysis based on the hashtags, such as (Kamath et al 2013), to identify the most relevant subjects. However, from our experience and also from a recent study (Potts et al 2011), although the use of hashtags to characterize a tweet is well known, most users tend to abuse (Woollaston 2013) or misuse (Henry 2012) hashtags or even to neglect the adoption of hashtags, leading to an even more complicated and most likely less reliable analysis.…”
Section: Methodology To Analyse Microblogging Content Based On the Exmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Twitter is a mixture of a social network and news media [24], where users follow each other [19] and use hashtags [20] to organize their messages. The complexity of Twitter data gives rise to a number of prediction tasks with a wide variety of possible techniques and solutions.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As additional relevant results addressing hashtag use, Spatial statistics of hashtag adoption are analyzed by Kamath et al [20]. Cheng et al [11] give methods to geolocalize tweets based on content.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Structural properties of the users' social networks have been found to have a strong influence on subsequent tie formation [5]. Geographical properties of the social network have also been linked to tie formation [21]. For example, Kleinberg [23,24] modelled the probability of two individuals being friends based on the intuition that friendship probability increases with geographic proximity.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%