2016
DOI: 10.1080/01621459.2015.1072541
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatio-Temporal Covariance and Cross-Covariance Functions of the Great Circle Distance on a Sphere

Abstract: In this paper, we propose stationary covariance functions for processes that evolve temporally over a sphere, as well as cross-covariance functions for multivariate random fields defined over a sphere. For such processes, the great circle distance is the natural metric that should be used in order to describe spatial dependence. Given the mathematical difficulties for the construction of covariance functions for processes defined over spheres cross time, approximations of the state of nature have been proposed… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
183
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 148 publications
(188 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
183
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mappings (6) and (7) are known as Exponential and Askey models, respectively. The former decreases exponentially to zero and it takes values less than 0.05 for θ > c, whereas the second is compactly supported, that is, it is identically equal to zero beyond the cut-off distance c. Explicit parametric conditions for the validity of the bivariate Exponential model are provided by Porcu et al (2016). On the other hand, Appendix B illustrates a construction principle that justify the use of bivariate Askey models on spheres.…”
Section: Parameterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Mappings (6) and (7) are known as Exponential and Askey models, respectively. The former decreases exponentially to zero and it takes values less than 0.05 for θ > c, whereas the second is compactly supported, that is, it is identically equal to zero beyond the cut-off distance c. Explicit parametric conditions for the validity of the bivariate Exponential model are provided by Porcu et al (2016). On the other hand, Appendix B illustrates a construction principle that justify the use of bivariate Askey models on spheres.…”
Section: Parameterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the univariate case (m = 1), Gneiting (2013) establishes that some classical covariances such as the Cauchy, Matérn, Askey and Spherical models, given in the classical literature in terms of Euclidean metrics, can be coupled with the geodesic distance under specific constraints for the parameters. Furthermore, Porcu et al (2016) propose several covariance models for space-time and multivariate RFs on spherical spatial domains.…”
Section: Skew-gaussian Rfs On the Unit Spherementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We first define the Gneiting class of functions (Gneiting, ), scriptGdim:false[0,false)2double-struckR+, as scriptGdimfalse(x1,x2false):=1ψfalse(x2false)dimfalse/2φ()x1ψfalse(x2false),2emx1,x20, where dim is the dimension of the space over which x 1 is computed and x 1 and x 2 are placeholders for h 2 , u 2 , or θ . A similar class is proposed by Porcu et al (), which we call the modified Gneiting class, scriptP:false[0,false)×false[0,πfalse]double-struckR, and is given by scriptPfalse(x1,x2false):=1ψfalse[0,πfalse]false(x2false)1false/2φ()x1ψfalse[0,πfalse]false(x2false),2emx10,x2false[0,πfalse]. For both classes, the function φ:false[0,false)double-struckR+ is completely monotonic; that is, φ is infinitely differentiable on (0, ∞ ), satisfying ( −1) n φ ( n ) ( t ) ≥ 0, ndouble-struckN. The function ψ is strictly positive and has a completely monotonic derivative.…”
Section: Covariance Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For stochastic processes on a sphere, the reader is referred to Jones (), Marinucci and Peccati () and the thorough reviews in Gneiting () and Jeong et al (). For space–time stochastic processes on the sphere, we refer the reader to the more recent approaches in Porcu et al (), Berg and Porcu () and Jeong and Jun (). Generalisations to multivariate space–time processes have been considered in Alegria et al ().…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%