2007
DOI: 10.1068/a38326
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatialising Participatory Approaches: The Contribution of Geography to a Mature Debate

Abstract: This paper explores the contribution that geographers can make to debates about the nature and utility of participatory approaches. It argues for a constructive reconciliation between these approaches and the growing poststructural critique of participation. Through an examination of the similarities and entanglements between power and empowerment it highlights the centrality of geographical issues to understanding how participation works and how its resources might be distanciated beyond the arenas of partici… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
163
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 154 publications
(164 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
163
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If we are to take our own and research participants' emotions seriously, we should address their potential and impact within the framing of our broader research questions; how we negotiate research ethics; the relationships developed through empirical encounters in the field, and how we ultimately withdraw from them; the ways in which we supervise others' research and/or are supervised; and our relations with co-researchers. I highlighted 'participatory (action) research' earlier, and I believe that such methods offer the potential for open, reflective, responsive and dynamic approaches (see Kesby 2007;Kindon et al 2007) that enable/allow for 'emotional work' among researchers and participants. Participatory methods are certainly not unproblematic, though (see Cooke and Kothari 2001), neither are they always appropriate/rigorous in different research contexts.…”
Section: Insert Figure 2 Here: Inter/subjectivity In Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…If we are to take our own and research participants' emotions seriously, we should address their potential and impact within the framing of our broader research questions; how we negotiate research ethics; the relationships developed through empirical encounters in the field, and how we ultimately withdraw from them; the ways in which we supervise others' research and/or are supervised; and our relations with co-researchers. I highlighted 'participatory (action) research' earlier, and I believe that such methods offer the potential for open, reflective, responsive and dynamic approaches (see Kesby 2007;Kindon et al 2007) that enable/allow for 'emotional work' among researchers and participants. Participatory methods are certainly not unproblematic, though (see Cooke and Kothari 2001), neither are they always appropriate/rigorous in different research contexts.…”
Section: Insert Figure 2 Here: Inter/subjectivity In Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section we look at agency promoting and inhibiting actions in the classroom and other contexts. Kesby (2005Kesby ( & 2007 has formulated the concept of 'participatory spaces' which he says are:…”
Section: Pedagogic Practices For Participation Including Peer Culturmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is, however, something of 'spatial turn' (Silvey, 2010) within scholarship at the interface of political geography and critical development studies on governance in the Global South. Work here has looked at critically at conscious efforts to 'reform' the state, through programmes of institution building (Chhotray, 2008), fostering public participation (Li 2007;Mohan, 2007) and delivering empowerment (Kesby, 2007), all of which emphasise the inherently spatialised nature of governance practices (Ferguson and Gupta, 2002;Corbridge et al, 2005): this paper aims to add to this earlier work by highlighting the geographies of exclusion produced through decentralisation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%