2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.01.053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial variation of chemical constituents from the burning of commonly used biomass fuels in rural areas of the Indo-Gangetic Plain (IGP), India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
26
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
3
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The higher EF PM from dung compared to wood has been observed previously for fuel-based and energy-based EF (Venkataraman and Rao, 2001;Sheesley et al, 2003;Keene et al, 2006;Oanh et al, 1999;Saud et al, 2013). The induced-draught stove when burning charcoal 20 emitted less PM than a mixture of hardwood and dung (Figure 4), consistent with prior studies that demonstrated that charcoal leads to relatively low PM emissions (Kshirsagar and Kalamkar, 2014).…”
supporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The higher EF PM from dung compared to wood has been observed previously for fuel-based and energy-based EF (Venkataraman and Rao, 2001;Sheesley et al, 2003;Keene et al, 2006;Oanh et al, 1999;Saud et al, 2013). The induced-draught stove when burning charcoal 20 emitted less PM than a mixture of hardwood and dung (Figure 4), consistent with prior studies that demonstrated that charcoal leads to relatively low PM emissions (Kshirsagar and Kalamkar, 2014).…”
supporting
confidence: 80%
“…For the four field tests of traditional mud stoves, PM 2.5 mass was comprised of 49-65% OC and 3.5-18% EC (Table S2) with maximum OC:EC occurring for dung cake are consistent with prior studies of similar fuel types in the IGP (Saud et al, 2013;Deka and Hoque, 2015). Major inorganic ions contributing to PM 2.5 mass include potassium (0.5-1.8%), ammonium (0.8-5.7%), and chloride (2.4-9.9%), with minor contributions (< 0.6%) from sodium, 15 calcium, fluoride, nitrate, and sulfate.…”
supporting
confidence: 71%
“…Technical details of the extraction process, sample preparation and analysis of WSIC have been discussed in Saud et al (2013) and Sen et al (2014). Similarly, trace gases emitted during the combustion process were estimated by the chemical wet method.…”
Section: Analysis Of Water-soluble Ionic Component (Wsic) Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SO 2 EF was substantial lower in the present study than those reported by Sen et al (2014) ; cation: 0.43 ± 0.18 g kg -1 ). Saud et al (2011Saud et al ( , 2012Saud et al ( , 2013, b Sen et al (2014), c Based on total consumption of biomass fuels (FW + DC).…”
Section: Comparison Of Emission Of Pollutants From Northwestern Himalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Residential burning resulted in an EF for TSP of 4.45 ± 0.42 g/kg. In the literature, PM emission factors were significantly higher for raw dung cake [6,28,46] and dung briquette combustion [46] than for other fuels.…”
Section: Residences (A) Compacted Biomassmentioning
confidence: 99%