2019
DOI: 10.1049/iet-ipr.2018.5727
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial‐spectral classification of hyperspectral images: a deep learning framework with Markov Random fields based modelling

Abstract: This version is available at https://strathprints.strath.ac.uk/65510/ Strathprints is designed to allow users to access the research output of the University of Strathclyde. Unless otherwise explicitly stated on the manuscript, Copyright © and Moral Rights for the papers on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright owners. Please check the manuscript for details of any other licences that may have been applied. You may not engage in further distribution of the material for any pro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The traditional classification algorithms such as support vector machine [18], multinomial logistic regression (LR) [19], minimum spanning forest [20] and so on are used in classification of HSI. Recently, deep learning (DL) [21] has produced encouraging results on HSI classification [22–29] because of its ability to automatically learn representative features from the data. Various DL methods have been proposed in literature such as stacked autoencoder, deep belief network and convolutional neural network (CNN) [30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The traditional classification algorithms such as support vector machine [18], multinomial logistic regression (LR) [19], minimum spanning forest [20] and so on are used in classification of HSI. Recently, deep learning (DL) [21] has produced encouraging results on HSI classification [22–29] because of its ability to automatically learn representative features from the data. Various DL methods have been proposed in literature such as stacked autoencoder, deep belief network and convolutional neural network (CNN) [30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the increase attention to the spatial information of HSI, CNN has become the popular method for the HSI classification [24]- [29]. It has been proved that CNNs can simultaneously extract both spatial and spectral features of HSI to produce precise classification results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the aforementioned methods focus more on the spectral information only, where the spatial information has not been adequately considered. Recently, some improved approaches have also been proposed, such as the composite kernel SVM [15], the ensemble-based random forest [16], and the random field-based method [17,18]. Furthermore, effective feature extraction techniques have developed for HSI classification, such as the principal component analysis (PCA) and its variations [19,20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%