2012
DOI: 10.1007/s00704-012-0707-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial response of two European atmospheric circulation classifications (data 1901–2010)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first one occurs in December and January, and the less evident second maximum is recorded in Central Europe in July and August (Keevallik et al 1999;Hoy et al 2012), as well as in East and North Europe from September to October (Chen 2000;Sepp and Jaagus 2002). In East-Central Europe, the second maximum is more evident in autumn, when the frequency of days with south-westerly advection is higher than in summer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The first one occurs in December and January, and the less evident second maximum is recorded in Central Europe in July and August (Keevallik et al 1999;Hoy et al 2012), as well as in East and North Europe from September to October (Chen 2000;Sepp and Jaagus 2002). In East-Central Europe, the second maximum is more evident in autumn, when the frequency of days with south-westerly advection is higher than in summer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In this group, the best known ones include the Grossweterlagen classification developed for Central Europe (Baur 1937;Hess and Brezowsky 1977;Werner and Gerstengarbe 2010), the Lamb classification referring to the region of the British Islands (Lamb 1972) and the Vangengeim-Girs classification developed for the north-east part of Europe (Vangengeim 1935;Girs 1971). They were used in numerous climatological studies (e.g., Bárdossy and Caspary 1990;Keevallik et al 1999;Kaszewski and Filipiuk 2003;Stehlík and Bárdossy 2003;Ustrnul 2006;Hoy et al 2012Hoy et al , 2013. The assessment of the effect of atmospheric circulation on the variability of atmospheric conditions in Poland frequently involves the application of manual classifications by Osuchowska-Klein (1978) and Niedźwiedź (1981).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This pattern has also been shown to underlie summer warming on longer timescales in the late Holocene (Della-Marta et al, 2007;Trouet et al, 2012;Yiou et al, 2012). Changes in atmospheric circulation have a significant influence on European climate (Sepp and Jaagus, 2002;van Ulden and van Oldenborgh, 2006;Hoy et al, 2013), but many climate models have difficulty reproducing this aspect of modern climate (van Ulden and van Oldenborgh, 2006;Woollings, 2010;Kjellstrom et al, 2011;Brands et al, 2013). The warming in Europe during the mid-Holocene simulated in climate models differs fundamentally from that shown in the data, and indicates a high sensitivity in models to the effects of the amplified seasonal insolation cycle experienced at this time, showing greater warming (cooling) in summer (winter) in response to increased (decreased) summer (winter) insolation.…”
Section: The Atmospheric Circulationmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Several climate indices are also used in this study, including: (1) The ACI, also known as the Vangengeim-Girs index, calculated based on atmospheric activity in the Atlantic-Eurasia region (Girs 1974;Klyashtorin 1998;Hoy et al 2013); (2) The NPI, defined by Trenberth and Hurrell (1994) as an area-weighted SLP average over (30-65°N, 160°E-140°W); (3) The southern oscillation index (SOI), defined as the leading principal component (PC) of winter SLP anomalies over (40°S-20°N, 90°E-65°W) (this SOI is similar to that defined by Trenberth (1984), as the Tahiti pressure minus the Darwin pressure, and the correlation coefficient between the two is as high as 0.81 during 1871-2003); (4) The eastern Pacific wave train (EPW), defined as the volume average of the seasonal vertical wave activity flux in the domain . This definition of the EPW describes the strength of both the vertical and horizontal fluxes well (Sun and Tan 2013).…”
Section: Datasets and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%