Spatial patterns of agricultural expansion determine impacts on biodiversity and carbon storage

Abstract

The agricultural expansion and intensification required to meet growing food and agri-based product demand present important challenges to future levels and management of biodiversity and ecosystem services. Influential actors such as corporations, governments, and multilateral organizations have made commitments to meeting future agricultural demand sustainably and preserving critical ecosystems. Current approaches to predicting the impacts of agricultural expansion involve calculation of total land conversion and assessment of the impacts on biodiversity or ecosystem services on a per-area basis, generally assuming a linear relationship between impact and land area. However, the impacts of continuing land development are often not linear and can vary considerably with spatial configuration. We demonstrate what could be gained by spatially explicit analysis of agricultural expansion at a large scale compared with the simple measure of total area converted, with a focus on the impacts on biodiversity and carbon storage. Using simple modeling approaches for two regions of Brazil, we find that for the same amount of land conversion, the declines in biodiversity and carbon storage can vary two-to fourfold depending on the spatial pattern of conversion. Impacts increase most rapidly in the earliest stages of agricultural expansion and are more pronounced in scenarios where conversion occurs in forest interiors compared with expansion into forests from their edges. This study reveals the importance of spatially explicit information in the assessment of land-use change impacts and for future land management and conservation.ecosystem services | deforestation | agricultural expansion | fragmentation | edge effects

Forecasts of urbanization scenarios reveal trade-offs between landscape change and ecosystem services

“…rapid sprawl and infill new growth) is needed. It is likely that most urban growth occurs somewhere in the middle of this spectrum, with some configurations working better than others in different locations (Chaplin-Kramer et al 2015). Therefore, it is imperative to understand how changing urban form can impact ES, and if optimal configurations at landscape scales may be achieved (Polasky et al 2008).…”

The Challenges of Applying Planetary Boundaries as a Basis for Strategic Decision-Making in Companies with Global Supply Chains

“…The resulting predictions are typically at too coarse a scale to capture the full impacts of changes in land use. A further step is therefore needed to predict land use change at finer resolutions, in order to capture the impacts of fragmentation or other habitat configuration on biodiversity within a landscape [81,82]. However, models that predict land use change at a country or state level (e.g., through economic modelling) may be more practical, since existing land change models are often proprietary or complex, with locally specific parameterisations which make them difficult to apply by multinational companies making global decisions.…”

Comparing Quantity, Allocation and Configuration Accuracy of Multiple Land Change Models

“…Landscape configuration has been demonstrated to be an important factor in many research foci including biodiversity [27,28,[65][66][67], nutrient cycles [29], pollination [30], water quality [31], climate change [68], and mapping ecosystem services [69,70]. To account for this, a landscape similarity index (LSI) [71] was calculated for each simulation run using FRAGSTATS 4.1 [72].…”