2014
DOI: 10.1111/ddi.12186
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial mismatch of phylogenetic diversity across three vertebrate groups and protected areas in Europe

Abstract: Aim-We investigate patterns of phylogenetic diversity in relation to species diversity for European birds, mammals and amphibians, to evaluate their congruence and highlight areas of particular evolutionary history. We estimate the extent to which the European network of protected areas (PAs) network retains interesting evolutionary history areas for the three groups separately and simultaneously. Location-EuropeMethods-Phylogenetic (QE PD ) and species diversity (SD) were estimated using the Rao's quadratic e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
75
0
4

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
4
75
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, areas with the most coral species that are current targets of conservation efforts are also characterized by high levels of evolutionary redundancy, whereby species tend to be very closely related to one another [81]. In particular, the Coral Triangle region, long recognized as a biodiversity hotspot for corals and other taxa [62,[82][83][84], has the lowest PD relative to the random expectation (electronic supplementary material, figure S2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, areas with the most coral species that are current targets of conservation efforts are also characterized by high levels of evolutionary redundancy, whereby species tend to be very closely related to one another [81]. In particular, the Coral Triangle region, long recognized as a biodiversity hotspot for corals and other taxa [62,[82][83][84], has the lowest PD relative to the random expectation (electronic supplementary material, figure S2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The global mammal functional distance matrices (Gower distance for multiple traits and Euclidean distance for log transformed body-mass) together with the phylogenetic distances were extracted from [81]. The list of mammal species for Europe was extracted from [82]. Colours represent the 10 and the 5 most frequent orders at global and European scales, respectively.…”
Section: Box 3 Measuring Species Scarcity and Restrictednessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This book is organized around three main themes: questions, methods and applications. We hope that this concentrated effort will contribute to Vane-Wright et al 1991 ;May 1990 ;Faith 1992 ;Posadas et al 2001 ;Pavoine et al 2005 ;Redding and Mooers 2006 ;Isaac et al 2007 ;Steel et al 2007 ;Hartmann and Steel 2007 ;Lozupone and Knight 2005 ;Rosauer et al 2009 ;Cadotte and Davies 2010 ;Chao et al 2010 Comparison of phylogenetic measures Schweiger et al 2008 ;Davies and Cadotte 2011 ;Pio et al 2011 Comparison of phylogenetic diversity to traditional measures Polasky et al 2002 ;Rodrigues and Gaston 2002 ;Rodrigues et al 2005Rodrigues et al , 2011Hartmann and André 2013 Inclusion of phylogenetics in systematic conservation planning Walker and Faith 1994 ;Arponen 2012 Prioritization of areas for the conservation of evolutionary history Posadas et al 2001 ;Lehman 2006 ;McGoogan et al 2007 ;López-Osorio and Miranda-Esquivel 2010 ;Forest et al 2007 ;Buerki et al 2015 ;Pollock et al 2015 ;Zupan et al 2014 Prioritization of species Weitzman 1998 ;Isaac et al 2007 ;Kuntner et al 2011 ;Redding et al 2015 Relationship between extinctions and the loss of phylogenetic diversity Nee and May 1997 ;Purvis 2008 ;…”
Section: Glossarymentioning
confidence: 99%