2017
DOI: 10.3390/w9120953
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial Evaluation of Multiple Benefits to Encourage Multi-Functional Design of Sustainable Drainage in Blue-Green Cities

Abstract: Urban drainage systems that incorporate elements of green infrastructure (SuDS/GI) are central features in Blue-Green and Sponge Cities. Such approaches provide effective control of stormwater management whilst generating a range of other benefits. However these benefits often occur coincidentally and are not developed or maximised in the original design. Of all the benefits that may accrue, the relevant dominant benefits relating to specific locations and socio-environmental circumstances need to be establish… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
85
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
85
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been alleged in the literature that little if any direct attention is given to the planning of the wider benefits to SuDS. For example, according to Fenner [33], any systematic procedure for pro-actively developing drainage infrastructure to deliver a specified range of predetermined desirable multiple benefits is rare and instead, if any multiple benefits emerge, this is at best sporadic, coincidental or at worst accidental. Interviewees report that multifunctional benefits are only purposively designed into 'big schemes', where there is availability of land.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been alleged in the literature that little if any direct attention is given to the planning of the wider benefits to SuDS. For example, according to Fenner [33], any systematic procedure for pro-actively developing drainage infrastructure to deliver a specified range of predetermined desirable multiple benefits is rare and instead, if any multiple benefits emerge, this is at best sporadic, coincidental or at worst accidental. Interviewees report that multifunctional benefits are only purposively designed into 'big schemes', where there is availability of land.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other authors expanded the set of optimization functions considered, to include avoided flood damage costs (Cunha et al, 2017) as well as benefit intensity and benefit profile associated with a broader range of societal benefits, or ecosystem services, potentially provided by LID practices (Fenner, 2017). Di Matteo et al (2017b) presented one of the broadest optimization frameworks, which sought to identify optimal solutions across multiple stakeholders.…”
Section: Watershed-scale Lid Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Implications to watershed-scale planning and assessment. Even amid evidence from field and monitoring studies that demonstrate the potential to improve watershed hydrologic function through LID and evidence of a high willingness to pay for associated environmental and amenity benefits among watershed inhabitants (Brent et al, 2017), widespread and watershed-scale implementation of LID lags (Dhakal and Chevalier, 2017;Fenner, 2017). Barriers to LID adoption may take the form of policy, governance, resource or cognitive barriers (Dhakal and Chevalier, 2017;Cousins, 2017;Kim and Li, 2017).…”
Section: Watershed-scale Lid Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is being done through the development of the next generation of hydrosystems models [2] that bridge the interfaces between urban/rural and engineering/natural hydrological systems. Flexible adaptation pathways are being assessed using a multiple benefits approach [3] to determine the most effective mix of blue-green and grey systems for any given location and time. Capturing the resource potential of stormwater through rainwater harvesting [4] and local energy recovery using micro-hydropower [5] is being examined as part of a multifunctional systems approach to urban flood management [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%