2015
DOI: 10.1890/14-1479.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial convergent cross mapping to detect causal relationships from short time series

Abstract: Recent developments in complex systems analysis have led to new techniques for detecting causal relationships using relatively short time series, on the order of 30 sequential observations. Although many ecological observation series are even shorter, perhaps fewer than ten sequential observations, these shorter time series are often highly replicated in space (i.e., plot replication). Here, we combine the existing techniques of convergent cross mapping (CCM) and dewdrop regression to build a novel test of cau… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
246
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 198 publications
(270 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
246
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…CCM tests for significant causal relationships by recognizing that the observed values of a forcing process should be significantly better explained by observed values of a response process than expected by chance, and that the accuracy of that explanation should improve with increasing time series length (Sugihara et al 2012, Clark et al 2015, Ye et al 2015. We used a variant of CCM, multispatial CCM, which is appropriate for spatially replicated time series that individually contain short series (∼ 30) of sequential ecological observations of systems that share similar dynamics (Clark et al 2015), such as samples (5 cm slices) from our four individual cores.…”
Section: Data Synthesis and Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…CCM tests for significant causal relationships by recognizing that the observed values of a forcing process should be significantly better explained by observed values of a response process than expected by chance, and that the accuracy of that explanation should improve with increasing time series length (Sugihara et al 2012, Clark et al 2015, Ye et al 2015. We used a variant of CCM, multispatial CCM, which is appropriate for spatially replicated time series that individually contain short series (∼ 30) of sequential ecological observations of systems that share similar dynamics (Clark et al 2015), such as samples (5 cm slices) from our four individual cores.…”
Section: Data Synthesis and Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…parrotfish abundance, urchin abundance, accretion rate), 2) test for nonlinearity and stochastic noise to ensure that none of the processes were purely random and that stochastic noise was not so large that causal links could not be recovered; stochasticity and nonlinearity were tested by visually assessing whether predictive power was reasonably high for short time steps and decreased with increasing prediction time, respectively (Sugihara et al 2012, Clark et al 2015, 3) calculate the ability of two processes to describe each other's dynamics using CCM by confirming that predictive skill (Pearson correlation coefficient, rho) increased with greater sample size, 4) use bootstrapping with replacement to leverage spatial information to reshuffle the order of spatial replicates and calculate rho, and 5) use nonparametric bootstrapping to test whether predictions indicated a significant causal relationship by determining whether calculated rho was significantly greater than zero and whether it increased significantly with sample size. One hundred bootstrap iterations were performed for steps 4 and 5.…”
Section: Data Synthesis and Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is always possible to get bi-directional convergence when variables are strongly forced by an external third variable, resulting in synchrony between variables being assessed. Synchrony should be tested for convergent cross-mapping to determine bi-directional pairing (Sugihara et al, 2012;Clark et al, 2015). When synchrony exists, it can sometimes be minimised by processing the "first difference" of cross-correlated variables by subtracting previous observations (at time t − 1) from current observations (at t) in the original time series prior to performing the analysis (Granger and Newbold, 1974).…”
Section: Correlation and Causalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dotted lines on either side of the predictive-skill curves represent the ±standard error of estimate assessed from bootstrapping based on 3000 iterations. Convergent cross-mapping is based on procedures written in the R-programming language initially developed by Clark et al (2015). The feature that assures causality in variables is the convergence in the predictive curves as record length increases.…”
Section: Oasis Enhanced Vegetation Index Development Vs Evaporationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are alternative methods to extract causality networks from short time series, in particular Multispatial CCM [26,27] appears to perform well for short time series. A comparison between different approaches and the application of these methods to real data will be extremely interesting.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%