2016
DOI: 10.3390/rs8070535
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial Autocorrelation and Uncertainty Associated with Remotely-Sensed Data

Abstract: Virtually all remotely sensed data contain spatial autocorrelation, which impacts upon their statistical features of uncertainty through variance inflation, and the compounding of duplicate information. Estimating the nature and degree of this spatial autocorrelation, which is usually positive and very strong, has been hindered by computational intensity associated with the massive number of pixels in realistically-sized remotely-sensed images, a situation that more recently has changed. Recent advances in spa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Spatial autocorrelation in the reference data has long been known to affect the classification and accuracy assessment [39,40,59,60]. Different sampling strategies for data splitting have already been studied in the literature including spatial [42,55,61,62] and aspatial approaches [61,[63][64][65].…”
Section: Effect Of Spatial Autocorrelation: the Sloo-cv Strategy As Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spatial autocorrelation in the reference data has long been known to affect the classification and accuracy assessment [39,40,59,60]. Different sampling strategies for data splitting have already been studied in the literature including spatial [42,55,61,62] and aspatial approaches [61,[63][64][65].…”
Section: Effect Of Spatial Autocorrelation: the Sloo-cv Strategy As Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the amount of uncertainty in existing LUC mapping information significantly impairs the reliability of classification products [5]. Researchers developing methods of measuring the uncertainty in LUC data focused on quantifying the uncertainty in remote sensing images, determining the classification uncertainty, and assessing the accuracy of LUC products [6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. For example, Griffith and Chun [7] studied the uncertainty in spatial autocorrelation parameters in a spatial autoregressive model associated with remotely sensed images.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spatial autocorrelation prevails in virtually all georeferenced data [24], and it is widely used in Remote Sensing for information extraction [25][26][27], for landslide susceptibility [28] and hazard modeling [29]. The method to measure changes of spatial autocorrelation proposed in this work is based on the analysis of the temporal evolution of the Moran's I index [23], and semivariance measure [25,27] applied to the Log-Ratio (LR) layers obtained coupling consecutive SAR intensity images.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%