2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrh.2022.101142
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial and temporal simulation of groundwater recharge and cross-validation with point estimations in volcanic aquifers with variable topography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[79] estimated 9.4% of recharge and 20% of surface runoff of the mean annual precipitation. In this regard, the current study's findings confirm evidence from previous work conducted in volcanic aquifers with variable topography [80], where the spatial variation in recharge is influenced by topography, geomorphology, geology, and climatic setting, and higher recharges are observed in or adjacent to steep-sloping topographies, whereas valley bottoms experienced small recharges.…”
Section: Recharge and Runoff Estimatessupporting
confidence: 89%
“…[79] estimated 9.4% of recharge and 20% of surface runoff of the mean annual precipitation. In this regard, the current study's findings confirm evidence from previous work conducted in volcanic aquifers with variable topography [80], where the spatial variation in recharge is influenced by topography, geomorphology, geology, and climatic setting, and higher recharges are observed in or adjacent to steep-sloping topographies, whereas valley bottoms experienced small recharges.…”
Section: Recharge and Runoff Estimatessupporting
confidence: 89%
“…All default parameters were retained except for the root depth of the forest, which was changed from 1 to 5 m considering the dominant presence of Eucalypts in the watershed forest cover. Similar changes were made by Yenehun et al (2022) and Yenehun et al (2020) when they applied WetSpass simulations to the Lake Tana basin and Gilgel Abay watershed, respectively [ 40 , 41 ].
Fig.
…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…The multi-year monthly mean GWSA variability was higher mainly in the southern and eastern periphery of Lake Tana. This was because these parts of the study area were replenished by the high amount of rainfall [ 100 ]. The net annual GWSA maps also presented that considerable fluctuations were confined to these hotspot parts of the sub-basin.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It might be due to uncertainties associated with specific yield (Sy) estimation and in-situ water table measurement imperfections [ 98 , 103 ]. In general, it can be comprehended that the results obtained in the study using GLDAS-2.2 are plausible; and are governed by precipitation, climatic events (droughts), anthropogenic activities, topography, and other groundwater recharge influencing factors [ 21 , 97 , 98 , 100 , 101 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%