2019
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6420/ab23da
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sparsity promoting regularization for effective noise suppression in SPECT image reconstruction

Abstract: The purpose of this research is to develop an advanced reconstruction method for low-count, hence high-noise, single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) image reconstruction. It consists of a novel reconstruction model to suppress noise while conducting reconstruction and an efficient algorithm to solve the model. A novel regularizer is introduced as the nonconvex denoising term based on the approximate sparsity of the image under a geometric tight frame transform domain. The deblurring term is based o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Form (4.2) relates to regularization by the envelope of the ℓ 0 norm and form (4.3) relates to regularization by the capped ℓ 1 norm [11]. For specific examples of f , see [31] for inverting incomplete Fourier transform, [32,33] for image/signal processing, [34] for medical image reconstruction and machine learning [16,17,21,29]. Employing the partition A j , j ∈ Z d+1 , of R d and the definition of • 0 , we have an alternative representation of function f :…”
Section: Sparse Regularization In the Spacial Domainmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Form (4.2) relates to regularization by the envelope of the ℓ 0 norm and form (4.3) relates to regularization by the capped ℓ 1 norm [11]. For specific examples of f , see [31] for inverting incomplete Fourier transform, [32,33] for image/signal processing, [34] for medical image reconstruction and machine learning [16,17,21,29]. Employing the partition A j , j ∈ Z d+1 , of R d and the definition of • 0 , we have an alternative representation of function f :…”
Section: Sparse Regularization In the Spacial Domainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aim of this work is to understand a global minimizer of regularization problems whose objective functions have the form of a fidelity term plus a regularization term involving the ℓ 0 norm. Regularization problems of this type appear frequently in recent studies of machine learning [16,17,21,29], computer graphics [8,27], signal processing [6,15,33], image processing [24,25,32], medical imaging [34] and statistics [9,35]. Many published results have demonstrated that the use of the ℓ 0 norm in regularization models promotes sparsity for the regularized solutions or the transformed regularized solutions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is desirable to develop solution representations of the minimum norm interpolation problem and the regularization problem convenient for algorithmic development. Inspired by the suc-cess of the fixed-point approach used in solving several types of finite dimensional problems such as machine learning [2,44,45,46,56], image processing [11,41,42,47,51], medical imaging [40,43,85] and solutions of semi-discrete inverse problems [27,37], we develop solution representations for the minimum norm interpolation problem and the regularization problem by using a fixed-point formulation via the proximity operator of the functions appearing in the objective function or constraints. This formulation has great potential for convenience of designing iterative algorithms for solving these problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We consider in this paper the convergence rate analysis of fixed-point algorithms. Fixed-point type algorithms have been popular in solving nondifferentiable convex or nonconvex optimization problems such as image processing [16,25,30,32,33,41], medical imaging [24,29,38,47], machine learning [14,27,28,36], and compressed sensing [21,48]. Existing fixed-point type algorithms for optimization including the gradient descent algorithm [8,39], the proximal point algorithm [37], the proximal gradient algorithm [7,35], the forward-backward splitting algorithm [15,45] and the fixed-point proximity algorithm [25,29,32,33].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%