1988
DOI: 10.1016/0045-6535(88)90242-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sources of dioxins in the environment: A study of PCDDs and PCDFs in ancient, frozen eskimo tissue

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other clearly pre-industrial data are available on tissue samples of Eskimos who were exposed to incomplete combustion products in their lives about 400 years ago. In these tissues, the levels of the studied tetra-to hexa-CDD/ Fs were below detection limits (Schecter et al 1988).…”
Section: Sedimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other clearly pre-industrial data are available on tissue samples of Eskimos who were exposed to incomplete combustion products in their lives about 400 years ago. In these tissues, the levels of the studied tetra-to hexa-CDD/ Fs were below detection limits (Schecter et al 1988).…”
Section: Sedimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concentrations of the most common 17 dioxin and dibenzofuran congeners were determined in the liver, the kidneys, the spleen and in fatty tissue by high resolution gas chromatography-high resolution mass spectrometry (HRGC-HRMS). All the analytical methods used have been previously described in detail [3,8,9,10,11].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is in part because the recent origin ofmost chlorinated dioxins and dibenzofurans. Also, the measurement ofthem in the environment and in humans is historically quite recent (52)(53)(54)(55)(56)(57) There is also evidence that there may be neurodevelopmental and other adverse health outcomes in children exposed in utero and/or by nursing to the closely related dioxinlike compounds PCBs and PCDFs (61)(62)(63)(64)(65). It would seem prudent to consider adverse health outcomes such as neurological, immune deficiency, or reproductive outcomes, rather than focus exclusively on the better-characterized cancer-inducing capability ofthe dioxins and related chemicals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%