2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10533-019-00608-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Source of organic detritus and bivalve biomass influences nitrogen cycling and extracellular enzyme activity in estuary sediments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 96 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Under these conditions, the C : N S threshold at which bacteria tend to immobilize N would be closer to 25 (Canfield et al 2005). This could explain why other studies did not find OM bulk C : N ratio a reliable metric to predict O 2 and N 2 exchange rates (Arnosti and Holmer 2003; Crawshaw et al 2019). Yet, we suggest that variation in C : N S ratio constitutes a plausible explanation for why organic N was largely more mobilized as DIN in the summer vs. spring treatments in our experiment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Under these conditions, the C : N S threshold at which bacteria tend to immobilize N would be closer to 25 (Canfield et al 2005). This could explain why other studies did not find OM bulk C : N ratio a reliable metric to predict O 2 and N 2 exchange rates (Arnosti and Holmer 2003; Crawshaw et al 2019). Yet, we suggest that variation in C : N S ratio constitutes a plausible explanation for why organic N was largely more mobilized as DIN in the summer vs. spring treatments in our experiment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Difficulties in addressing the role of OM quality as a rate‐controlling parameter also stem from the lack of standard characteristic(s) describing the nature of organic substrates (Arnosti and Holmer 2003; Aspetsberger et al 2007). Instead, a wide range of indicators have been associated to OM quality (e.g., bulk C : N : P stoichiometry, amino acid, fatty acid, or carbohydrate concentrations), with no consensus arising as to which one(s) could be most relevant for metabolic processes (Tuominen et al 1996; Arnosti and Holmer 2003; Crawshaw et al 2019). Yet, some lines of evidence suggest that the C : N ratio of organic substrates partly controls N regeneration from bacteria, and could thus have a direct influence on N cycling at the sediment–water interface (Goldman et al 1987; Tezuka 1990).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To help evaluate soil N as well as C depolymerization, the activities of six additional hydrolytic enzymes were determined (Table 1). We interpreted protease and aminopeptidases as N-cycling enzymes since the proteinaceous substrates hydrolyzed by these enzymes are more N enriched relative to C compared with other substrates (e.g., chitin) (Berges & Mulholland, 2008;Chen et al, 2018;Crawshaw et al, 2019;Vranova et al, 2013), though soil enzymes that hydrolyze C-N bonds can be sensitive to microbial C demand (Mori, 2020: Norman et al, 2020. In 50-ml centrifuge tubes, 1 g of ovendried equivalent of soil, 4 ml of 18.2 MΩ cm −1 water and 1 ml of substrate solution at the appropriate concentration (Table 1) were added.…”
Section: Enzyme Assaysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Organic matter quality and quantity affect bacterial abundance and enzyme activity with higher quality OM increasing EEA (Hoppe et al 2002). For example, EEA related to N acquisition decreased in the presence of mangrove detritus (Crawshaw et al 2019). Previous studies have also shown that enzyme activity rates are highest in surface or near-surface soils and decrease with depth (Minick et al 2022) likely due to the in ux of fresh OM that stimulates microbial activity in sediment surfaces (Naylor et al 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%