2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2019.01.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sound symbolism in sighted and blind. The role of vision and orthography in sound-shape correspondences

Abstract: Non-arbitrary sound-shape correspondences (SSC), such as the "bouba-kiki" effect, have been consistently observed across languages and together with other sound-symbolic phenomena challenge the classic linguistic dictum of the arbitrariness of the sign. Yet, it is unclear what makes a sound "round" or "spiky" to the human mind. Here we tested the hypothesis that visual experience is necessary for the emergence of SSC, supported by empirical evidence showing reduced SSC in visually impaired people. Results of t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Chinese speakers use Roman letters (Pinyin) when interacting with computers. From this perspective, then, it is important to see our results alongside the fact that the bouba/kiki effect has also been found in congenitally blind individuals [ 73 ], in at least some studies of pre-literate children [ 51 , 77 , 79 ], as well as in some cultures that do not use written language [ 37 ]. Taken together, this evidence converges to indicate that bouba/kiki exists, to a substantial extent, independently of orthography, and thus, appears to be rooted in crossmodal correspondence between the spoken words and visual shapes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Chinese speakers use Roman letters (Pinyin) when interacting with computers. From this perspective, then, it is important to see our results alongside the fact that the bouba/kiki effect has also been found in congenitally blind individuals [ 73 ], in at least some studies of pre-literate children [ 51 , 77 , 79 ], as well as in some cultures that do not use written language [ 37 ]. Taken together, this evidence converges to indicate that bouba/kiki exists, to a substantial extent, independently of orthography, and thus, appears to be rooted in crossmodal correspondence between the spoken words and visual shapes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…While orthography can clearly play a role in the bouba/kiki phenomenon, evidence from studies with different populations suggests that there is also some genuinely vocal basis for the effect. For example, early blind individuals who have no experience with the Roman alphabet show the effect when feeling round and pointy shapes [73], although earlier investigations failed to establish this [74]. While a few studies have failed to find the bouba/kiki effect with pre-literate children [75,76], several others have shown the effect in children, including pre-literate ones [51,[77][78][79].…”
Section: Source Of the Bouba/kiki Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, certain sonorant consonants (/m/, /n/ and /l/; see Table 1 for definitions of linguistic terms), voiced stop consonants (/b/, /d/ and /g/, though to a lesser extent; cf. Bottini, Barilari, & Collignon, 2019), and back rounded vowels (e.g., /u/ as in who’d , and /oʊ/ as in hoed ) show an association with round shapes; while voiceless stop consonants (e.g., /p/, /t/ and /k/), and high-front unrounded vowels (e.g., /i/ as in heed ) show an association with sharp shapes (e.g., D’Onofrio, 2014; McCormick, Kim, List, & Nygaard, 2015; Nielsen & Rendall, 2011). The maluma/takete effect is not the only example of sound symbolism.…”
Section: Sound Symbolismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An extensive body of studies have investigated the phonetic and acoustic features that drive crossmodal correspondences (e.g., Aryani et al, 2018;Auracher, 2017;Bottini et al, 2019;Knoeferle et al, 2017;Margiotoudi and PulvermĂŒller, 2020;Rendall, 2011, 2013;Parise et al, 2014;Spector and Maurer, 2013;Westbury et al, 2018); however, little is known about the role of lexical tones. Approximately 60%-70% of world languages employ lexical tones (Yip, 2002), and the forms of lexical tones vary widely among tonal languages (see Best, 2019 for a review).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%