2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jece.2018.06.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sono-assisted synthesis of CuO nanorods–graphene oxide as a synergistic activator of persulfate for bisphenol A removal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Changes in the redox pairs of Fe (II) /Fe (III) and Cu (I) /Cu (II) were more obvious for CF/CF-a than for CFM/CFM-a, indicating that more electron capture occurred on the CF surface than for CFM and that it may have caused higher catalytic activity for CF in the ozonation process ( Figure 4 ). The loss of an electron from Cu (I) on the CuO could result in the formation of Cu (II) along with the decomposition of O 3 , which later generated both • OH and • O 2 − and later self-reacted to form 1 O 2 , as the major active species ( Figure 8 A) (Equations (16)–(19)) [ 41 , 42 , 43 ]. However, in addition, the • OH was also responsible for this oxidation process (Equation (18)).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Changes in the redox pairs of Fe (II) /Fe (III) and Cu (I) /Cu (II) were more obvious for CF/CF-a than for CFM/CFM-a, indicating that more electron capture occurred on the CF surface than for CFM and that it may have caused higher catalytic activity for CF in the ozonation process ( Figure 4 ). The loss of an electron from Cu (I) on the CuO could result in the formation of Cu (II) along with the decomposition of O 3 , which later generated both • OH and • O 2 − and later self-reacted to form 1 O 2 , as the major active species ( Figure 8 A) (Equations (16)–(19)) [ 41 , 42 , 43 ]. However, in addition, the • OH was also responsible for this oxidation process (Equation (18)).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various nanocatalysts have been reported for the degradation of BPA at different conditions, namely, Pd/Bi 4 O 5 Br 2 (Li et al, 2018), Cu 2 FeSnS 4 (Kong et al, 2019), Gd 2 WO 6 loaded ZnO/bentonite (Selvakumar et al, 2019) CuO is a nontoxic, easy to prepare, high visible light optical absorption coefficient and has extensively gained recognition in photocatalysis (Mirzai et al, 2020;Wang et al, 2022). As a result of the lower bandgap of CuO (1.8 eV), the application of pure CuO for photocatalytic degradation has many drawbacks, such as incomplete mineralization of organics, slow interfacial kinetics and quick recombination of electrons (e À ) and hole (h + ) (Wang et al, 2018;Zhang et al, 2020). Various methods have recently modified photocatalysts to improve their photodegradation rate and stability (Oh et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, the combination of AC/CFO-PS can effectively enhance the rate of photocatalytic depolarization and shorten the removal time for dyes in wastewater. [44]. Therefore, these results show that ferrous ion present in catalyst is an active agent in degradation of dye using PS activation [34,45].…”
Section: Effect Of Catalyst Dosagementioning
confidence: 60%
“…The excessive dosages of catalyst could remove SO4 •− radicals without reacting with contaminants, due to the reaction of PS for either producing SO5 •− or recombining the formation of S2O8 2- [44]. Therefore, these results show that ferrous ion present in catalyst is an active agent in degradation of dye using PS activation [34,45].…”
Section: Effect Of Catalyst Dosagementioning
confidence: 80%