2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-28535-7_8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solving Rough Differential Equations with the Theory of Regularity Structures

Abstract: The purpose of this article is to solve rough differential equations with the theory of regularity structures. These new tools recently developed by Martin Hairer for solving semi-linear partial differential stochastic equations were inspired by the rough path theory. We take a pedagogical approach to facilitate the understanding of this new theory. We recover results of the rough path theory with the regularity structure framework. Hence, we show how to formulate a fixed point problem in the abstract space of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Remark 5.4. A rigorous proof of the latter fact can be found for example in [Bra19,Lemma 3.10] where the author uses wavelets, but let us briefly and informally present an alternative approach in the spirit of the calculations above. Indeed, one wishes to set I t := R (F ) (1 (0∧t,0∨t] ), which is not possible because the indicator function is not a test-function.…”
Section: Approximating An Indicator Functionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Remark 5.4. A rigorous proof of the latter fact can be found for example in [Bra19,Lemma 3.10] where the author uses wavelets, but let us briefly and informally present an alternative approach in the spirit of the calculations above. Indeed, one wishes to set I t := R (F ) (1 (0∧t,0∨t] ), which is not possible because the indicator function is not a test-function.…”
Section: Approximating An Indicator Functionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…At this point, the reconstruction theorem is a purely analytic tool. This is surprising, as it is often applied in SPDEs, see for example [CFG17], [Hai14], [Bay+20], [Bra19] and many more. In all those examples, the reconstruction theorem only uses the analytic properties of the stochastic processes, neglecting their stochastic properties.…”
Section: Stochastic Reconstruction In a Nutshellmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, sewing can indeed be seen as the one-dimensional case of reconstruction. By a result of [Bra19], Lemma 3.10, we can reverse the time derivative and regain I(t) as "f (1 [0,t] )", which is of course only rigorous as the function z from Brault's Lemma, so the arrows in the middle can be reversed.…”
Section: Stochastic Reconstruction Is Stochastic Sewing In 1 Dimensionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We explore an approach based on Hairer's theory of regularity structures [Hai14], which goes back to [FH14], and show that every path with Sobolev regularity α ∈ (1/3, 1/2) and integrability p > 1/α can be lifted to a weakly geometric rough path possessing exactly the same Sobolev regularity. While the rough path lift of a Hölder continuous path is a known and fairly simple application of Hairer's reconstruction theorem ([Hai14, Theorem 3.10]), see [FH14,Proposition 13.23] or [Bra19], lifting a Sobolev path lies outside the current framework of regularity structures and thus requires some serious additional effort. Indeed, we need to use a Sobolev topology on the space of modelled distributions, as introduced in [HL17] and [LPT21b] (see also [HR20]) and additionally to generalize the definition of models from the originally required Hölder bounds to some more general Sobolev bounds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%