1995
DOI: 10.1137/1.9781611971217
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solving Least Squares Problems

Abstract: In the linear models practicals we used the R function lm to fit linear models. The aim of this assignment is to demonstrate how to compute least squares parameter estimates using the so-called QR method and how this method can be implemented in R. The QR method is the default procedure used by the lm function.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
3,616
0
43

Year Published

1997
1997
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4,435 publications
(3,663 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
3,616
0
43
Order By: Relevance
“…T 2 distributions were created using 120 T 2 times logarithmically spaced between 0.5 × first echo time and 2 × last echo time, resulting in a range of 5-2240 ms. NNLS was used to fit a basis of T 2 times to the decays [26,5] and regularization was performed using a generalized cross-validation approach [27,28].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…T 2 distributions were created using 120 T 2 times logarithmically spaced between 0.5 × first echo time and 2 × last echo time, resulting in a range of 5-2240 ms. NNLS was used to fit a basis of T 2 times to the decays [26,5] and regularization was performed using a generalized cross-validation approach [27,28].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One problem with the standard LS method of branch length estimation (e.g., Rzhetsky and Nei 1993) is that some branch length estimates may become negative. We therefore suggest that the ordinary LS method with the constraint of nonnegative branches be used (e.g., Lawson and Hanson 1974;Felsenstein 1995).…”
Section: Distance Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Through computer simulation, the performance of the proposed method, abbreviated as Twomey, was examined both qualitatively and quantitatively in comparison with lead field normalized minimum norm approach (also known as "weighted minimum norm"; Lawson and Hanson, 1974) and the 90% fMRI-constrained Wiener estimation, denoted as WMN and Wiener, respectively. The simulation was conducted on a realistic-geometry BEM-model reconstructed from the T1-weighted MRI images of a human subject (128 slices, 256×256 pixels; 1.6 mm thickness, 1.17×1.17 mm in-plane resolution).…”
Section: Computer Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%