1974
DOI: 10.1001/archderm.110.3.389
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solar- vs heat-induced urticaria

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
2

Year Published

1983
1983
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The situation is similarly unsatisfying in solar urticaria (SU). Chlorpheniramine, hydroxyzine and other H 1 blockers have been reported as good (28,29), moderate (30,31), variable (32), or ineffective (24,33). Although my own experiences are also mixed, a trial with H 1 blockers is nevertheless worthwhile for adjunctive symptomatic control, particularly with the newer nonsedating antihistamines (28,34).…”
Section: Antihistaminesmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The situation is similarly unsatisfying in solar urticaria (SU). Chlorpheniramine, hydroxyzine and other H 1 blockers have been reported as good (28,29), moderate (30,31), variable (32), or ineffective (24,33). Although my own experiences are also mixed, a trial with H 1 blockers is nevertheless worthwhile for adjunctive symptomatic control, particularly with the newer nonsedating antihistamines (28,34).…”
Section: Antihistaminesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Antihistamine treatment of heat contact urticaria (HU) is worthwhile in the 50% of patients in whom the disease is mast cell and not complement dependent. This may explain why the drugs have been rated as good to helpful (18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23) or ineffective (24)(25)(26) in older studies. Newer antihistamines may not suffice to entirely suppress symptoms, as exemplified by a case with proven histamine release on challenge who was treated with a combination regimen of old and new antihistamines (27).…”
Section: Antihistaminesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Das Aktionsspektrum liegt demnach im ultravioletten und sichtbaren Strahlenbereich.Zu unterscheiden sind hierbei folgende Wellenlängenbereiche: UV-B (280-320 nm),UV-A2 (320-340 nm), UV-A1 (340-400 nm) und sichtbares Licht (400-800 nm).Urtikarielle Reaktionen auf solare Infrarotstrahlung sollten als Wär-meurtikaria klassifiziert werden [65].…”
Section: S Schauder · Universitäts-hautklinik Göttingengöttingenunclassified
“…Die Symptome der Lichturtikaria lassen sich durch nicht sedierende Antihistaminika (H1-Rezeptorenantagonisten) [16] wie Terfenadin [6,12],Astemizol [38], Cetirizin [39] oder Fexofenadin [58],aber auch durch das Antidepressivum Doxepin lindern [41]. Unter hohen Dosen von Terfenadin und Astemizol können kardiotoxische Wirkungen auftreten [6].Gelegentlich wurde auch Chloroquin mit Erfolg eingesetzt [65]. Neuere Therapieversuche umfassen die Anwendung von Cyclosporin [14] und Immunglobulinen [44].…”
Section: Therapieunclassified