1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0038-092x(99)00037-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solar Versus Green: The Analysis of a Norwegian Row House

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
41
0
5

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
3
41
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Historically, the contribution of embodied energy was considered minimal compared to energy consumption trough the operational phase [33,35,[37][38][39][40][41][42]. However, for low energy houses, this is not the case as the lifetime energy consumption is much lower while the embodied energy is higher due to additional-sometimes pretty sophisticated-construction materials, energy production and recovery systems [30,35,[43][44][45][46][47][48].…”
Section: Embodied Energy (Construction)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Historically, the contribution of embodied energy was considered minimal compared to energy consumption trough the operational phase [33,35,[37][38][39][40][41][42]. However, for low energy houses, this is not the case as the lifetime energy consumption is much lower while the embodied energy is higher due to additional-sometimes pretty sophisticated-construction materials, energy production and recovery systems [30,35,[43][44][45][46][47][48].…”
Section: Embodied Energy (Construction)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the case study of 60 residential and non-residential units in nine countries by Sartori and Hestnes (2007) demonstrates the design benefit of low energy buildings in encouraging both a net benefit in total life cycle energy demand and an increase in embodied energy. Similarly, the analysis of Norwegian houses by Winther and Hestnes (1999) and Feist (1996) showed low energy buildings to be a result of specific design criteria, demanding less operating energy and less total energy than those built according to conventional criteria. Levine et al (2007) suggested a simple strategy to reduce heating and cooling loads by isolating the building from the environment by using high levels of insulation, optimising the glazing area and minimising the infiltration of outside air.…”
Section: Planning and Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With regards to this issue, a number of studies have estimated the energy content of the measures that lead to improved energy efficiency, mainly for domestic uses (Kaufmann and Azary-Lee, 1990;Feist, 1996;Winther and Hestnes, 1999;Casals, 2006;Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution, 2007;Sartori and Hestnes, 2007;Chitnis et al, 2013;Cellura et al, 2013). This approach to the indirect rebound effect is thus specific for each energy service.…”
Section: In the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%