2014
DOI: 10.1002/2014ja020300
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solar cycle variations of trapped proton flux in the inner radiation belt

Abstract: Trapped proton population in the inner radiation belt is highly dense, posing a potential danger to astronauts and man-made space assets traversing through this region. While being significantly stable within timescales up to hundreds of days, inner zone proton fluxes can exhibit considerable solar cycle variations, which has not been investigated comprehensively yet. To analyze the long-term variation of the South Atlantic Anomaly (SAA), we adopt the proton flux data measured by NOAA 15 from 1999 through 2009… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
62
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
5
62
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The westward drift rate as well as latitudinal and longitudinal solar cycle oscillations are well recovered in agreement with results from other recent studies (e.g. Qin et al, 2014). In Qin et al (2014), they identify a 685 days time delay between the F10.7 solar index and the proton flux longitudinal evolution.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The westward drift rate as well as latitudinal and longitudinal solar cycle oscillations are well recovered in agreement with results from other recent studies (e.g. Qin et al, 2014). In Qin et al (2014), they identify a 685 days time delay between the F10.7 solar index and the proton flux longitudinal evolution.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Qin et al, 2014). In Qin et al (2014), they identify a 685 days time delay between the F10.7 solar index and the proton flux longitudinal evolution. They obtain these results studying protons with energies > 70 MeV, so no direct comparisons can be made with our results which focus on protons with energy > 16 MeV.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations