2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2011.05.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soil soluble carbon dynamics of manured and unmanured grasslands following chemical kill and ploughing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
13
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
2
13
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Consistent with this paradigm all of our soils released more C during the anoxic incubations than at similar pH in oxic incubations (p b 0.01; Table 2). In addition, our incubations release six to over 400 times as much carbon during anoxic incubation than previously published work (Fiedler and Kalbitz, 2003;Grybos et al, 2009;Hagedorn et al, 2000;Jacinthe et al, 2003;MacDonald et al, 2011). The high amounts of C mobilization in our study likely reflect the substantial (8-32%) C content of the horizons we studied, although C content does not explain the slightly lower dispersion of C in the Pu'u Eke (350 ky) soil relative to the other soils (Tables 1 and 2).…”
Section: Carbon Mobilization During Fe Reductioncontrasting
confidence: 42%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Consistent with this paradigm all of our soils released more C during the anoxic incubations than at similar pH in oxic incubations (p b 0.01; Table 2). In addition, our incubations release six to over 400 times as much carbon during anoxic incubation than previously published work (Fiedler and Kalbitz, 2003;Grybos et al, 2009;Hagedorn et al, 2000;Jacinthe et al, 2003;MacDonald et al, 2011). The high amounts of C mobilization in our study likely reflect the substantial (8-32%) C content of the horizons we studied, although C content does not explain the slightly lower dispersion of C in the Pu'u Eke (350 ky) soil relative to the other soils (Tables 1 and 2).…”
Section: Carbon Mobilization During Fe Reductioncontrasting
confidence: 42%
“…Our work suggests that nanoparticulate and colloidal C are important contributors to mobile organic carbon (MOC), which have been overlooked in previous studies that lump DOC as any C that passes through 200 nm (e.g., Grybos et al, 2009), 450 nm (e.g., Fiedler and Kalbitz, 2003;Hagedorn et al, 2000;MacDonald et al, 2011), or even micron sized filters (e.g., Jacinthe et al, 2003). In fact, the large majority of MOC released in our anoxic experiment was colloidal (b430 nm) or nano-particulate C (2.3-60 nm) rather than soluble C (b10,000 Da) (Figs.…”
Section: Carbon Mobilization During Fe Reductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This makes grassland renovation, even in its extreme form of ploughing and reseeding, different from the transformation to arable land where the soil will be regularly disturbed by tillage, and large quantities of C and N will inevitably be lost over a long period of time that can actually last decades (Davies, Smith, & Vinten, ; Springob, ). Immediate large N leaching losses and emissions of C and other greenhouse gases are almost unavoidable when grassland is turned to arable cropping (Curtin, Fraser, & Beare, ; Kayser, Seidel, Müller, & Isselstein, ; MacDonald, Chantigny et al., ; Poeplau et al., ; Velthof et al., ).…”
Section: Renovation and Related Yields And C Fluxesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there is still a lack of systematic research on the topic. Nutrient emissions occur as gaseous losses and leaching (MacDonald, Chantigny et al., ). Emissions of CO 2 are related to soil mineralization (Willems et al., ), and N 2 O mainly to enhanced N turnover and fertilization (Merbold et al., ) with the additional risk of indirect N 2 O emissions that are related to larger NO 3 leaching losses (Davies et al., ; Krol et al., ; MacDonald, Rochette et al., ).…”
Section: Renovation and Emission Risksmentioning
confidence: 99%