1998
DOI: 10.1007/s003740050411
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soil microbial and extractable C and N after wildfire

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

10
57
0
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 153 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
10
57
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The concentrations of microbial C and extractable C, which were similar to those found in previous studies in similar soils (Díaz-Raviña et al, 1988;1993;Prieto et al, 1998;Leirós et al, 2000;Basanta et al, 2002), lied in the reported range given for forest soils (Wardle, 1992). As previously observed, among the soil characteristics analysed total C (r = 0.62, p < 0.001), total N (r = 0.42, p < 0.01), water holding capacity (r = 0.56, p < 0.001) and moisture content (r = 0.52, p < 0.001) were significantly and positively Table 3.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The concentrations of microbial C and extractable C, which were similar to those found in previous studies in similar soils (Díaz-Raviña et al, 1988;1993;Prieto et al, 1998;Leirós et al, 2000;Basanta et al, 2002), lied in the reported range given for forest soils (Wardle, 1992). As previously observed, among the soil characteristics analysed total C (r = 0.62, p < 0.001), total N (r = 0.42, p < 0.01), water holding capacity (r = 0.56, p < 0.001) and moisture content (r = 0.52, p < 0.001) were significantly and positively Table 3.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The lack of correlation is not surprising, as DNA ext is considered less reliable as a measure of microbial biomass estimate than is C mic . In general, C mic measurements following wildfires showed significant reductions and these reductions were sustained over periods of up to 13 years (16,24,35,42). The heat of the Chisholm-Slave Lake area wildfire likely had a direct effect, killing a substantial fraction of microbial biomass, but we cannot rule out other indirect causes of reduction of microbial biomass, such as changes in nutrient supply due to loss of plant cover.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Biomass most often decreases as a result of these disturbances, and this effect can last for many years (5,16,17,35,39,42,44). Culture-based analyses indicated effects of both fire and harvesting on the composition of microbial communities (18,38,54).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Si bien se han observado disminuciones de hasta el 96% en biomasa microbiana inmediatamente después de un evento de este tipo (Hernández et al 1997), ningún ecosistema se mantiene estéril, aun después de un disturbio severo (Busse y deBano 2005). Al igual que en Trevelin, distintos estudios muestran una recuperación de las poblaciones de organismos en el suelo mineral, a niveles de prefuego dentro de uno a cuatro años después del mismo (Vázquez et al 1993, Prieto-Fernández et al 1998. Las condiciones del sitio y las condiciones climáticas anteriores y posteriores al fuego son importantes, ya que pueden influenciar la naturaleza de éste y la recuperación del sitio (Neary et al 1999).…”
Section: Resultsunclassified