2021
DOI: 10.1111/gcb.16036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soil enzymes as indicators of soil function: A step toward greater realism in microbial ecological modeling

Abstract: Soil carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) cycles and their complex responses to environmental changes have received increasing attention. However, large uncertainties in model predictions remain, partially due to the lack of explicit representation and parameterization of microbial processes. One great challenge is to effectively integrate rich microbial functional traits into ecosystem modeling for better predictions. Here, using soil enzymes as indicators of soil function, we developed a competitive dynamic enzyme al… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 111 publications
(130 reference statements)
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such fast data accumulation has profoundly advanced the understanding of changes in soil microbial communities under various environment conditions as well as their ecological functions (Luo et al, 2016 ; Smercina et al, 2021 ). For example, emerging studies provide compelling evidence that explicit incorporation of microbial processes into mechanistic modeling has substantially improved projections of soil carbon (C) and nutrient cycling and reduced model uncertainties (Wang, Gao, et al, 2021 ; Wieder et al, 2015 ). These studies have spurred laboratory‐scale and field‐scale research to explore the patterns and mechanisms of soil microbial communities, functions, and the ecological implications.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Such fast data accumulation has profoundly advanced the understanding of changes in soil microbial communities under various environment conditions as well as their ecological functions (Luo et al, 2016 ; Smercina et al, 2021 ). For example, emerging studies provide compelling evidence that explicit incorporation of microbial processes into mechanistic modeling has substantially improved projections of soil carbon (C) and nutrient cycling and reduced model uncertainties (Wang, Gao, et al, 2021 ; Wieder et al, 2015 ). These studies have spurred laboratory‐scale and field‐scale research to explore the patterns and mechanisms of soil microbial communities, functions, and the ecological implications.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2) Exploring useful proxies (e.g., genes, enzymes, and other functional traits) for the species‐rich soil microbial communities (Treseder et al, 2012 ; Trivedi et al, 2013 ). For example, by representing various C‐N‐associated enzyme‐mediated processes into the Microbial‐Enzyme Decomposition model as a proxy of microbial processes, Wang, Gao, et al ( 2021 ) profoundly improved model simulations of soil C and N cycling. (3) Applying emerging advanced data‐analytic approaches (e.g., hierarchical random‐matrix, eco‐evolutionary dynamics, machine learning, ecological networks) for integrating the mechanistic understanding of key microbial processes with data from multiple scales (Matchado et al, 2021 ; Zhang et al, 2022 ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inconsistency between MBC and Rh at a seasonal scale indicates that microbial physiology may play a predominant role in affecting the SOC mineralization ( 46 , 47 ). The inconsistency between MBC and Rh also challenges the traditional view that declining microbial biomass leads to a possible decline in Rh ( 48 , 49 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A proper calibration of 𝑘 𝑖 is especially important for the HUM pool, since it is the most important parameter for the determination of long term SOC stock in RothC (Cagnarini et al, 2019). Since 𝑘 𝑖 is an implicit representation of the degradation activity of the soil biota, to improve its representation in soil carbon cycling models, and explicit representation of the biological and ecological processes in the soil should be considered; various studies are already going in that direction (Allison et al, 2010;Wang et al, 2015Wang et al, , 2022Sulman et al, 2018), but still need further testing before being used to predict SOC changes in field conditions.…”
Section: Analysis Of Sueca Mulch Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%