2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.08.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soft overcomes the hard: Flexible materials adapt to cell adhesion to promote cell mechanotransduction

Abstract: Cell behaviors and functions show distinct contrast in different mechanical microenvironment. Numerous materials with varied rigidity have been developed to mimic the interactions between cells and their surroundings. However, the conventional static materials cannot fully capture the dynamic alterations at the bio-interface, especially for the molecular motion and the local mechanical changes in nanoscale. As an alternative, flexible materials have great potential to sense and adapt to mechanical changes in s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
45
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
1
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5 C, and D, the cell viability of the hydrogel IV group increased compared with that of the control group in 72 h, probably due to the hydrogel IV composed of chitosan and gelatin simulated the extracellular matrix (ECM) [ [40] , [41] , [42] ]. The cell viability of fibroblasts cultured with the hydrogel Ⅳ for 72 h in the high levels of glucose and MMP-9 increased by 36.54 ± 7.38% compared with that of the glucose + MMP-9 group, may be attributed to the synergistic effect: insulin was released from the hydrogel Ⅳ through response to the environment, and insulin promotes cell proliferation [ 43 ]; the hydrogel IV promoted cell proliferation by being degraded in the high levels of glucose and MMP-9 [ 42 ]. Improving migration has also been shown to promote wound healing [ 36 ], and insulin stimulates the migration of fibroblasts [ 44 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…5 C, and D, the cell viability of the hydrogel IV group increased compared with that of the control group in 72 h, probably due to the hydrogel IV composed of chitosan and gelatin simulated the extracellular matrix (ECM) [ [40] , [41] , [42] ]. The cell viability of fibroblasts cultured with the hydrogel Ⅳ for 72 h in the high levels of glucose and MMP-9 increased by 36.54 ± 7.38% compared with that of the glucose + MMP-9 group, may be attributed to the synergistic effect: insulin was released from the hydrogel Ⅳ through response to the environment, and insulin promotes cell proliferation [ 43 ]; the hydrogel IV promoted cell proliferation by being degraded in the high levels of glucose and MMP-9 [ 42 ]. Improving migration has also been shown to promote wound healing [ 36 ], and insulin stimulates the migration of fibroblasts [ 44 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of the scratch assay and the wound closure rate are shown in Fig. 5 E and F. Compared with the control group, the cell mobility of the hydrogel Ⅳ group increased by 30.83 ± 6.19% within 24 h, which may be attributed to the fact that the hydrogel Ⅳ simulated the ECM to promote cell adhesion [ 42 ]. At high glucose concentrations (***P < 0.001), the increased migration ability of fibroblasts incubated with hydrogel IV within 24 h may be due to the fact that the hydrogel Ⅳ simulated the ECM while releasing insulin [ 44 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…10–12 A variety of surfaces and scaffolds with different stiffnesses have been prepared for investigating the stiffness-dependent differentiation of stem cells. 13–20 A soft matrix is beneficial for the differentiation of stem cells into the soft tissue cell lineage, and vice versa .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mechanical properties (e.g., stiffness and viscosity) of both natural and synthetic extracellular matrices significantly influence cell phenotype and functions. Conversely, cells can also exert traction forces to their 3D surroundings. These tight interactions enable cells to rearrange their internal structures and adhesion molecules to adapt to the changing microenvironments, consequently enhancing their biological functions . Therefore, acquiring precise knowledge of the interplay between cells and their surroundings is critical for our understanding of mechanosensing and mechanotransduction.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%