2008
DOI: 10.1063/1.2838733
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soft-magnetic materials characterized using a superconducting solenoid as magnetic source

Abstract: Magnetization measurements of soft-magnetic materials can be affected if they are characterized using a superconducting solenoid. Recording hysteresis loops while stepping the magnetic field can cause an apparently inverted hysteresis, if due to the pinned remanent flux in the magnet the field at the sample location exceeds the sample’s coercive field. Hysteresis loops recorded while sweeping the field can also be affected by ramping rate. The sweeping-rate dependence is caused by leakage currents resulting fr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It should be noted that in a superconducting coil trapped magnetic flux may lead to deviations of reported and real magnetic field. Especially, when measuring the magnetization, magnetoresistance, or the Hall resistivity of a soft ferromagnet in a field sweep through zero, the reversal of the hysteresis (i.e., of the coercive fields) may be observed [37]. The presented data were measured in an MPMS3 magnetometer with a 7-T magnet and a PPMS with a 9-T magnet, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It should be noted that in a superconducting coil trapped magnetic flux may lead to deviations of reported and real magnetic field. Especially, when measuring the magnetization, magnetoresistance, or the Hall resistivity of a soft ferromagnet in a field sweep through zero, the reversal of the hysteresis (i.e., of the coercive fields) may be observed [37]. The presented data were measured in an MPMS3 magnetometer with a 7-T magnet and a PPMS with a 9-T magnet, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presented data were measured in an MPMS3 magnetometer with a 7-T magnet and a PPMS with a 9-T magnet, respectively. In field sweeps both systems typically produce a maximum field error of 20 Oe around zero field [37].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To take into account the remanent field due to trapped flux in the superconducting magnet coils, it was necessary to measure a standard paramagnetic Dy 2 O 3 pellet which exhibits no hysteresis. 30 This was done at T = 300 K in the field range of H = ±16 T with the same field step size and procedure used in measuring the RAF sample. The difference in field between the same magnetization values when ramping up and down in field was fitted to a Voigt line shape and the result was used to adjust the actual value of the magnetic field.…”
Section: Magnetometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Where the magnetic fields are concerned, it has to be noted that the "stealthy" properties of C-CSH also lead to much smaller errors of m caused by the trapped field of the superconducting magnet [19,20,[52][53][54]. They are also reduced 20 to 30 times, from a level of about +4 × 10 −7 emu when the specimen is housed in a single capsule to the magnetometer noise level of 10 −8 emu in C-CSH.…”
Section: Discussion: Validation and An Example Of The True Potentialmentioning
confidence: 99%