2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2005.04.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SOCS-1 inhibits expression of the antiviral proteins 2′,5′-OAS and MxA induced by the novel interferon-λs IL-28A and IL-29

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
67
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
67
0
Order By: Relevance
“…40,41 Furthermore, interferon response genes such as MxA and 5 0 3 0 OAS are activated 2 and subjected to typical regulatory mechanisms. 11 Although the IFN-l receptor is widely expressed, 2,3 expression of the ligand is tightly controlled and takes place after viral infection 2,17 or stimulation via many of the Toll-like receptors (TLRs), 15 a process that is elevated by IFN-a. 42 Expression via stimulation of TLR 7, 8 and 9 IFN-k1 downregulates the human Th2 response WJ Jordan et al is absolutely dependent on IRAK-4 signaling, whereas IFN-l1 can be transcribed following stimulation of the cell via TLR 3 or 4 in an IRAK-4-independent manner.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…40,41 Furthermore, interferon response genes such as MxA and 5 0 3 0 OAS are activated 2 and subjected to typical regulatory mechanisms. 11 Although the IFN-l receptor is widely expressed, 2,3 expression of the ligand is tightly controlled and takes place after viral infection 2,17 or stimulation via many of the Toll-like receptors (TLRs), 15 a process that is elevated by IFN-a. 42 Expression via stimulation of TLR 7, 8 and 9 IFN-k1 downregulates the human Th2 response WJ Jordan et al is absolutely dependent on IRAK-4 signaling, whereas IFN-l1 can be transcribed following stimulation of the cell via TLR 3 or 4 in an IRAK-4-independent manner.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 These observations, in conjunction with the induction of the IFN-l1/2/3 ligands by a range of viral infections and their ability to rescue virally infected cells, 2,3 have prompted a series of studies that have further investigated the antiviral properties of these cytokines. [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] However, the IFN-l ligands also induce the phosphorylation of STAT1, STAT3, STAT5 2,22 and STAT4. 23 Phosphorylation of STAT1, STAT3, STAT5 in particular, suggests more complex properties for the IFN-l ligand family; STAT3 is the signaling mechanism used by members of the IL-10 family (IL-10, IL-19, IL-20, etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…28 Combination treatment with IFN-a and IL-29/28A enhanced the antiviral effect against HCV replicon synergistically. 29 As described above, HCV replication is inhibited by the antiviral effects of IFN-l. A pegylated IFN-l1 has already been tried against chronic hepatitis C in phase 2 trials. 30,31 Interestingly, impressive antiviral effects (at least as good as with PegIFN-a) were observed but with fewer and less severe side effects.…”
Section: Il-28b and Its Function Against Hcvmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Type III IFNs induce the formation of both ISGF3 and STAT1 homodimers, which are able to recognize ISRE and GAS sequences [12,14,23]. Among the IFN-induced genes, suppressor of cytokine signaling (SOCS)1 and SOCS3 are involved in the negative regulation of type III IFN signaling [51,52]. Overexpression of SOCS1 in hepatic cell lines inhibits type III IFN signaling as well [51].…”
Section: Signal Transduction Of Type III Ifnsmentioning
confidence: 99%