Socioeconomic disparities and comorbidities, not race, affect salivary gland malignancy survival outcomes

Iwata, Ayaka J.; Williams, Amy M.; Taylor, Andrew; Chang, Steven S.

doi:10.1002/lary.26633

Cited by 13 publications

(18 citation statements)

References 44 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“… 12 , 13 Even in 10 and 5 year estimates, lower rates have been reported, ranging from 19.6% to 51% and 35.3% and 65.9%, respectively. 5 , 8 , 9 , 12 , 13 , 16 Higher values have also been presented in the literature. 4 , 17 Ouyang et al 4 presented 5, 10, and 15-year overall survival rates of 84.7%, 70.8%, and 34%, respectively.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 56%

Prognostic factors and overall survival in a 15-year followup of patients with malignant salivary gland tumors: a retrospective analysis of 193 patients

Filho

Rêgo

Mendes

et al. 2022

Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 56%

Prognostic factors and overall survival in a 15-year followup of patients with malignant salivary gland tumors: a retrospective analysis of 193 patients

Filho

Rêgo

Mendes

et al. 2022

Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…57,63,65,76,77,90 As a result, uninsured patients and patients of low SES or those residing in low SES areas tend to have worse overall and disease-specific survival outcomes. 10,25,59-64,91-98 Women have been shown to have better survival than men for cancers of the oropharynx 32,36,99-101 and some other subsites. 94,101 Two studies indicated that farther distance from a treating facility was associated with improved survival outcomes.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Systematic Review of Head and Neck Cancer Health Disparities: A Call for Innovative Research

Nallani

Subramanian²,

Ferguson-Square

et al. 2022

Otolaryngol.--head neck surg.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective (1) Describe the existing head and neck cancer health disparities literature. (2) Contextualize these studies by using the NIMHD research framework (National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities). (3) Explore innovative ideas for further study and intervention. Data Sources Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. Review Methods Databases were systematically searched from inception to April 20, 2020. The PRISMA checklist was followed (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses). Two authors reviewed all articles for inclusion. Extracted data included health disparity population and outcomes, study details, and main findings and recommendations. Articles were also classified per the NIMHD research framework. Results There were 148 articles included for final review. The majority (n = 104) focused on health disparities related to at least race/ethnicity. Greater than two-thirds of studies (n = 105) identified health disparities specific to health behaviors or clinical outcomes. Interaction between the individual domain of influence and the health system level of influence was most discussed (n = 99, 66.9%). Less than half of studies (n = 61) offered specific recommendations or interventions. Conclusions There has been extensive study of health disparities for head and neck cancer, largely focusing on individual patient factors or health care access and quality. This review identifies gaps in this research, with large numbers of retrospective database studies and little discussion of potential contributors and explanations for these disparities. We recommend shifting research on disparities upstream toward a focus on community and societal factors, rather than individual, and an evaluation of interventions to promote health equity.

show abstract

“…Therefore, we assigned ZIP code tabulation areas (ZCTA) to each patient based upon their home address and utilized these ZCTAs to obtain information about median household income and educational attainment from the 2019 American Community Survey (ACS). 15 Each of these factors reflects information about all households in the ZCTA and are, therefore, only surrogate markers of a patient’s true socioeconomic status (SES). We divided these two factors into quartiles to facilitate analysis.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Socioeconomic and Demographic Disparities in the Use of Telemedicine for Ophthalmic Care during the COVID-19 Pandemic

2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

show abstract

Socioeconomic disparities and comorbidities, not race, affect salivary gland malignancy survival outcomes

Abstract: 4. Laryngoscope, 127:2545-2550, 2017.

Cited by 13 publications

References 44 publications

Prognostic factors and overall survival in a 15-year followup of patients with malignant salivary gland tumors: a retrospective analysis of 193 patients

Prognostic factors and overall survival in a 15-year followup of patients with malignant salivary gland tumors: a retrospective analysis of 193 patients

A Systematic Review of Head and Neck Cancer Health Disparities: A Call for Innovative Research

Socioeconomic and Demographic Disparities in the Use of Telemedicine for Ophthalmic Care during the COVID-19 Pandemic

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About