Socioeconomic differences and persistent segregation of Italian territories during COVID-19 pandemic

Abstract

Lockdowns implemented to address the COVID-19 pandemic have disrupted human mobility flows around the globe to an unprecedented extent and with economic consequences which are unevenly distributed across territories, firms and individuals. Here we study socioeconomic determinants of mobility disruption during both the lockdown and the recovery phases in Italy. For this purpose, we analyze a massive data set on Italian mobility from February to October 2020 and we combine it with detailed data on pre-existing local socioeconomic features of Italian administrative units. Using a set of unsupervised and supervised learning techniques, we reliably show that the least and the most affected areas persistently belong to two different clusters. Notably, the former cluster features significantly higher income per capita and lower income inequality than the latter. This distinction persists once the lockdown is lifted. The least affected areas display a swift (V-shaped) recovery in mobility patterns, while poorer, most affected areas experience a much slower (U-shaped) recovery: as of October 2020, their mobility was still significantly lower than pre-lockdown levels. These results are then detailed and confirmed with a quantile regression analysis. Our findings show that economic segregation has, thus, strengthened during the pandemic.

Do We Learn From Errors? The Economic Impact of Differentiated Policy Restrictions in Italy

“…In the following, we motivate the set of province specific socio-economic characteristics that we consider in our analysis as potential drivers of the heterogeneous epidemiological and economic behaviour of territories implementing the same level of policy stringency. Specifically, since restrictions might have been associated with the exacerbation of socio-economic disparities (Bonaccorsi et al 2020(Bonaccorsi et al , 2021Polyakova et al 2020), we consider Income per capita and Inequality 12 in the distribution of income as drivers potentially affecting the outcome of the policy. Moreover, as the severity of the pandemic might have been influenced by demographic characteristics, we include in the analysis Population and Population Density (Sheridan et al 2020).…”

Responsiveness of open innovation to COVID-19 pandemic: The case of data for good

“…In general, mobility data have been suggested as a relevant input information to support the design of optimal restriction strategies [ 73 , 74 ]. Indeed, different authors highlighted how generalized national lockdown measures disproportionately affected local territories, disrupting existing value chains and raising inequalities across areas [ 27 , 65 , 75 , 76 ].…”

One Year of COVID-19 Vaccine Misinformation on Twitter: Longitudinal Study

“…In the United States, COVID-19 was the third leading cause of death in 2020 according to the National Center for Health Statistics [ 2 ]. Despite their socioeconomic repercussions [ 3 , 4 ], nonpharmaceutical interventions such as social distancing, travel restrictions, and national lockdowns have proven to be effective at slowing the spread of the coronavirus [ 5 - 7 ]. As the pandemic evolved, pharmaceutical interventions such as vaccinations and antiviral treatments became increasingly important to manage the pandemic [ 8 , 9 ].…”