Socioeconomic constraints, environmental impacts and drivers of change in the Congo Basin as perceived by logging companies

Pérez, M. Ruiz; Blas, Driss Ezzine de; Nasi, Robert; Sayer, Jeffrey; Karsenty, Alain; Sassen, M. M. A.; Gami, Norbert; Ndoye, O.; Ngono, G.; Nguinguiri, Jean Claude; Nzala, Donatien; Toirambe, Benjamin; Yalibanda, Yves

doi:10.1017/s0376892906003365

Cited by 7 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 4 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Some authors argue that the resource base for CFs in Cameroon has not changed positively ever since the concept was introduced; instead it is more and more threatened (Oyono et al 2012). Compared to other CFEs dealing with NTFPs and ecosystems services, the long-term sustainability of CFs that depend upon timber is more endangered because of the rush to make short-term gains by associating with industrial timber operators to intensify timber extraction (Oyono 2004a, Angu-Angu 2006, Ruiz Pérez et al 2006. Timber operations within CFs seem to be marred by illegal timber operators who are solicited by community forest members to bring in technical and financial resources to carry out such activities (Beauchamp and Ingram 2011, Tropenbos 2012, Merlet and Fracticelli 2016.…”

Section: Environmental Viabilitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Viability of community forests as social enterprises: A Cameroon case study

Foundjem-Tita¹,

Duguma²,

Speelman³

et al. 2018

E&S

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Since the concept of community forests was instituted in Cameroon in 1994, there has been an upsurge of such forest management arrangements in the country. However, up to now there is no conclusive evidence as to whether such schemes can operate as profitable ventures and at the same time meet their social and environmental objectives. The latter is the core objective of a social enterprise that constitutes the basis of our analysis. In fact, little attention has been paid to understanding the business side of community forests. In this regard, we review existing evidence about community forests making profits and simultaneously meeting their social and sustainable forest management goals. The analysis is based on a range of literature covering 20 years of community forestry experience in Cameroon and also from information gathered from nine case study community forests in Cameroon. Although not overwhelming, the existing literature shows that community forests can be run as profitable enterprises. However, profitability is conditional on the type of activities the enterprises engaged in, the capacity of the community forest entrepreneurs to run the business themselves rather than subcontracting, and on the capacity of the enterprises, especially timber related ones, to diversify into nontimber forest products (NTFPs) and agricultural activities. The available evidence suggests mixed results about the contribution of community forests to community development projects and livelihoods, and emphasizes that the legal form of the community forest, the kind of enterprise the community focuses on and the type of support received by the community forest are important drivers of viable community forest enterprises. The study further notes the absence of a sustainable funding model for community forest enterprises and recommends that government should officially classify them in the social enterprise sector. By so doing, community forests can benefit from special programs meant for the social enterprise sector including the provision of starting capital and capacity building on basic business principles.

show abstract