2016
DOI: 10.5958/0976-4666.2016.00037.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Socio-economic profile of the common adopters of improved practices of crops and livestock enterprises and their problems and suggestive measures-A case study in adopted and non-adopted villages in North Eastern India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…55% had no formal education; 62% had less than 30 years of farming experience; 42% had an annual income below Rs.25,000/-and 35% had an annual income ranging between Rs.25,000-40,000/-.The main crops in the village were paddy, cotton, maize, sorghum, pigeon pea and vegetables. With regard to age, similar results were reported by Dhayal and Mehta [18,19,20] in their studies that majority of the farmers who adopting different crop technologies were found in middle age group.…”
Section: Socio-demographic Characteristics Of Study Respondentssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…55% had no formal education; 62% had less than 30 years of farming experience; 42% had an annual income below Rs.25,000/-and 35% had an annual income ranging between Rs.25,000-40,000/-.The main crops in the village were paddy, cotton, maize, sorghum, pigeon pea and vegetables. With regard to age, similar results were reported by Dhayal and Mehta [18,19,20] in their studies that majority of the farmers who adopting different crop technologies were found in middle age group.…”
Section: Socio-demographic Characteristics Of Study Respondentssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…All these circumstances results in limited tangibility of the impact of climate smart adaptive livelihood practices. Also since these practices has not reached to a broader area and researches to study the impact are also very few in number and it becomes very difficult to prove the impact of climate smart adaptive livelihood practices in front of farmers due to which convincing them for adopting such practices is not so easy [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A study carried out by Chapke (2009) revealed that about 83 per cent jute growers were unaware about the technologies developed by ICAR-CRIJAF such as jute varieties, fibre extractor machine, herbicide, intercropping, recommended fertilizer dose, line sowing by furrow seed drill and seed treatment. The lack of awareness and low adoption of modern agricultural technologies have increased the vulnerability of the farm households towards production risks (Nain et al, 2014;Singha et al, 2016). Therefore, it is important to recognize the particular characteristics that will determine not only their adoption behaviour but their rejection and discontinuance as well.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%