2017
DOI: 10.1080/02732173.2017.1334606
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social Sources of Community Solidarity in U.S. Congregations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, we controlled for congregational attendance using an ordinal variable ranging from 0 to 8 to account for the important role congregations play in shaping beliefs and behaviors (Ferguson et al. 2017; Martinez and Tamburello 2018; Stroope and Baker 2014). The corresponding response categories for religious service attendance are: never, less than once a year, once or twice a year, several times a year, once a month, 2–3 times a month, about weekly, weekly, and several times a week.…”
Section: Methods and Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, we controlled for congregational attendance using an ordinal variable ranging from 0 to 8 to account for the important role congregations play in shaping beliefs and behaviors (Ferguson et al. 2017; Martinez and Tamburello 2018; Stroope and Baker 2014). The corresponding response categories for religious service attendance are: never, less than once a year, once or twice a year, several times a year, once a month, 2–3 times a month, about weekly, weekly, and several times a week.…”
Section: Methods and Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following the coding of prior research, 1 = those who selected the first two responses indicating they have a strong sense of belonging that is either consistent with or growing from how they felt the previous year and 0 = all other responses (Dougherty and Whitehead ; Ferguson et al. ; Martinez and Dougherty ; Stroope ; Stroope and Baker )…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I transformed this variable into a dichotomous measure since the provided responses do not provide an unambiguous ordinal scale. Following the coding of prior research, 1 = those who selected the first two responses indicating they have a strong sense of belonging that is either consistent with or growing from how they felt the previous year and 0 = all other responses (Dougherty and Whitehead 2011;Ferguson et al 2017;Martinez and Dougherty 2013;Stroope 2011;Stroope and Baker 2014). 3 The second dependent variable of belonging is more objective and measures whether or not the individual has close friends within the congregation.…”
Section: Dependent Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many individuals participate and remain in congregations in part for friendship and feelings of belonging and community (Ferguson et al 2017 ; Gallagher 2020 ; Sikkink and Emerson 2020 ; Stark and Finke 2000 ; Tsang 2015 ). Given the large size of megachurches, it may be harder for some people to make friends and feel a strong sense of belonging.…”
Section: Multiple Congregational Attendancementioning
confidence: 99%